0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 35153 times.
Yet to be fair (and if I remember correctly) the Nagys were also the least expensive cables in the system, so value-wise they have a lot to offer. SN
I'm hoping that MikeC, Andy, Triode Pete, Emil, Bill and Toobluvr will post what they heard this Saturday also. The cables went home with John (Toobluvr) so I'm sure he will post his thoughts once he gets time to try them out.
"C'mon guys.....get real. You can't really believe that Mr Nagy was serious with that proclamation! In audio, noone in their right mind can say anything is the absolute best in all situations and for all listeners. I never for a single second expected it to be the best across the board. I think it's kindof silly to hold him to that standard, regardless of his bravado. I know others will disagree, just because they wanna play "gotcha". But come on, we all know exactly what he was doing."Some audiophiles have no sense of humor when it comes to sacred cows or cables.
........I would like to clarify something you guys brought up... When you say light/thin sounding, do you mean a lack of bass, or just light because the midrange/lower treble is either too present, or too laid back? One of the biggest problems in a lot of audio equipment is that the upper midrange is too forward. It's especially true for a lot of speaker manufacturers (inaccurate crossover slopes calculated from theoretical calculators and not real life Thiele and Small parameter calculations using added mass, no time/phase alignment, no Zobel, no baffle step, etc.)
A lot of people use dull sounding cables to kill some of that brightness/shoutiness of equipment. At this point the cables act as tuners and not as something that's supposed to transfer the signal with 100% integrity. My design goals were not to make something sound less bright, more natural because it sounds less bright, etc. My design goals were to make a signal transfer with as close to zero loss as possible.