Who makes amps with Class A bias?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 51689 times.

AJinFLA

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 1115
  • Soundfield Audio Loudspeakers
    • Soundfield Audio
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #160 on: 8 Jul 2014, 11:29 pm »
If you are saying that all those parts in the studio harm the sound then I agree.
No, that's not what I'm saying at all. :wink:

I have/heard plenty recordings that predate the "audiophile"/magic parts era, that are of outstanding fidelity. Others, more recent, that have traveled a million studio miles of commodity parts, being used a reference standards and for device test in my audio club.
Go figure.

cheers,

AJ

Freo-1

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #161 on: 8 Jul 2014, 11:54 pm »
No, that's not what I'm saying at all. ;)

I have/heard plenty recordings that predate the "audiophile"/magic parts era, that are of outstanding fidelity. Others, more recent, that have traveled a million studio miles of commodity parts, being used a reference standards and for device test in my audio club.
Go figure.

cheers,

AJ










Likely made by Decca engineers with tubes and simple circuits!   Amazing.




Carl V

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 574
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #162 on: 9 Jul 2014, 12:38 am »
Sorta like Sausage.  If ya like the end product don't ask how & what
was involved.....Sometimes despite all those Studio steps, and non-audiophile
cables, op-amps etc., the end product is of "audiophile caliber".

AJ was observing
that Audiophiles will obsess about one Boutique part that they can swap out & yet
not worry about all the non-botique parts further up the chain.

Not unlike the comment From Roger about worrying about 1 meter of Power
cord material/composition & yet not worry about the miles of Power lines from
Hoover Damn, the hundred  yards of Romex in your house. Or the many
yards or feet of small gauge wire in Transformers etc., YET audiophiles worry
about the last little bit of wire that they can see & swap out.




Roger A. Modjeski

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #163 on: 9 Jul 2014, 03:36 am »
No, that's not what I'm saying at all. :wink:

I have/heard plenty recordings that predate the "audiophile"/magic parts era, that are of outstanding fidelity. Others, more recent, that have traveled a million studio miles of commodity parts, being used a reference standards and for device test in my audio club.
Go figure.

cheers,

AJ

Some would say that a tube Ampex studio machine is better sounding than a Studer A 80. You can include me in that. All the Patsy Cline, Buddy Holly, Dina Washington, Count Basie and others from that period were recorded through very simple control boards onto Ampex 300s and 350s. They sound mighty good to me.

G Georgopoulos

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 1253
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #164 on: 9 Jul 2014, 03:46 am »
Roger

fast amps lack good bass,what do you think?

Roger A. Modjeski

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #165 on: 9 Jul 2014, 03:56 am »
Roger

fast amps lack good bass,what do you think?

I dont see any reason for them to have bad bass. There is no reason for the top end to affect the bottom.

AJinFLA

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 1115
  • Soundfield Audio Loudspeakers
    • Soundfield Audio
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #166 on: 9 Jul 2014, 11:29 am »
Some would say that a tube Ampex studio machine is better sounding than a Studer A 80. You can include me in that. All the Patsy Cline, Buddy Holly, Dina Washington, Count Basie and others from that period were recorded through very simple control boards onto Ampex 300s and 350s. They sound mighty good to me.
Then I think we are in agreement?
What about 70s stuff, like Cat Stevens Tea for the Tillerman? I wonder if audiophiles consider this (fairly popular/well known) as well recorded, pristine SQ?

cheers,

AJ

Carl V

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 574
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #167 on: 9 Jul 2014, 07:55 pm »
Then I think we are in agreement?
What about 70s stuff, like Cat Stevens Tea for the Tillerman? I wonder if audiophiles consider this (fairly popular/well known) as well recorded, pristine SQ?

cheers,

AJ

I would think most would...didn't Harry Pearson of TAS enjoy the SQ.

G Georgopoulos

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 1253
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #168 on: 11 Jul 2014, 03:02 am »

The balance between stability and good high frequency performance (not just slew rate but low distortion and good damping at high frequencies)is not an easy one to achieve. Although this is often touched upon in an EE education, if one is fortunate enough to find an analog design course,  it is done in a strange mathematical way. While the professor and text will go on about phase shift and Nyquist conditions for stability they really don't get into how to measure it and how do deal with the consequences in a practical way. When i was at UVA in 1973 we touched on this. I had already designed a few SS amps in my teen years (for my band) and I was ready for them to pour the knowledge into me. Unfortunately none of them had built any SS amps.

Forgive my digression: here is the problem we now face and will get worse. Little by little EE programs have become CE (computer engineering) programs and there are very few schools that still give a hoot about analog at all. This is one reason for me starting a school to teach these things, many of which I have had to learn on my own. As I have often said "Where is the next generation of Audio Engineers"

yeah learning the old fashion way is better,however internet is really one of the best schools around,don't you think?

Roger A. Modjeski

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #169 on: 11 Jul 2014, 04:12 am »
yeah learning the old fashion way is better,however internet is really one of the best schools around,don't you think?

 :nono: I don't think so. There is a lot of misinformation on the net. How can someone learning sort out what is true and what is false and what is unsubstantiated opinion? The explanations given often disobey Ohm's or some other law. Most of the guys on the DIY sites are absolutely lost. There are some guys who know what is going on but not enough to monitor all the absolutely incorrect things I read. Not to name a  name but there are several sites that show oscilloscope photos, graphs, schematics but often the explanation of what is going on is incorrect. The pictures they put up and what they say is so well done that one would think they are correct... but they are not.

Read up on OTL amps, they are very much misunderstood. Just because someone gets one going that doesn't mean he understands how it works or that it works well.

What do you think about the claims made for some modifications like tuning fuses. Can a fuse really be microphonic?  :lol: If someone would tell me the microphonic output of the fuse I could work it out to how much that would influence the signal. In fact I did that on Audiogon Forum.

G Georgopoulos

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 1253
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #170 on: 11 Jul 2014, 05:02 am »
:nono: I don't think so. There is a lot of misinformation on the net. How can someone learning sort out what is true and what is false and what is unsubstantiated opinion? The explanations given often disobey Ohm's or some other law. Most of the guys on the DIY sites are absolutely lost. There are some guys who know what is going on but not enough to monitor all the absolutely incorrect things I read. Not to name a  name but there are several sites that show oscilloscope photos, graphs, schematics but often the explanation of what is going on is incorrect. The pictures they put up and what they say is so well done that one would think they are correct... but they are not.



Roger thanks,given what i know about electricity false/wrong ways won't work anyway,now if something works but differs from your perspective is not false? is just different!..

Roger A. Modjeski

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #171 on: 11 Jul 2014, 05:27 am »
Roger thanks,given what i know about electricity false/wrong ways won't work anyway,now if something works but differs from your perspective is not false? is just different!..

There are many amplifiers out there that have glaring errors yet do work.. but not very well. Most every designer wants to describe his ciruit and how it is better than whatever he is comparing it to. Someone can have a circuit that works but have an incorrect understanding about how it works. Of they can take a circuit that works really well and point out what is very wrong with it that is actually very right.

It's not my perspective I am discussing here it is absolute truth. For instance Ohms law is absolute truth. What I am speaking of is when someone incorrectly points out how a circuit works or does not work. There are several people who have miss-misinterpreted the Futterman drive circuit in print and furthermore based their designs on ways to correct Futterman's drive.  They usually say the drive is not equal to the push and pull tubes when in fact it is. I would hope if I sat down with one of theses people I could help them see that the drive is equal.

Pneumonic

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #172 on: 11 Jul 2014, 08:39 pm »

What do you think about the claims made for some modifications like tuning fuses. Can a fuse really be microphonic?  :lol: If someone would tell me the microphonic output of the fuse I could work it out to how much that would influence the signal. In fact I did that on Audiogon Forum.

Forget microphonic. I'd just like to see a single report on a fuse's performance that shows any error in distortion, noise or frequency response? You'd think the (audio) fuse companies would be all over this if they indeed had such evidence.

Pneumonic

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #173 on: 11 Jul 2014, 08:51 pm »
There are many amplifiers out there that have glaring errors yet do work.. but not very well. Most every designer wants to describe his ciruit and how it is better than whatever he is comparing it to. Someone can have a circuit that works but have an incorrect understanding about how it works.
I can actually accept if the designer doesn't get it right (for whatever reason) ... so long as it's not marketed as correct  :wink:

What I can't stand is when companies deceitfully market their product's advantages. Like, for example, the designers who spend inordinate time fluffing up how important their design is when it comes to the make-up (type and character) of the distortion in place, having you believe that the type of pattern of distortion is key when, if one simply makes said distortions inaudible, it doesn't matter what make-up of distortions are present since they can't be heard.

*Scotty*

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #174 on: 11 Jul 2014, 10:42 pm »
Pneumonic, do all amplifiers sound the same?
Scotty

Roger A. Modjeski

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #175 on: 11 Jul 2014, 11:14 pm »
Forget microphonic. I'd just like to see a single report on a fuse's performance that shows any error in distortion, noise or frequency response? You'd think the (audio) fuse companies would be all over this if they indeed had such evidence.

Thanks for a well stated question. I will make this as plain as possible. Lets look at what does affect distortion, noise or frequency response.

Distortion is determined by the amplifying circuit and do a small extent the characteristics of the power supply. All circuits reject power supply noise and other effects to some extent.

People love to talk about the importance of power supplies so lets look at that. To see if a fuse can affect the power supply we have to look at what things affect the voltage. The voltage of your power supply is regulated in most preamps and all digital sources because it has to be.  Wide variations of line voltage are turned into very small variations by the regulator. A good regulator will reduce a 10 % line variation to less than 0.01 % or better. Some supplies reject input noise and variation by 100.000 to 1. Now while your regulator is dealing with these large variations in voltage input the fuse cannot add any significant variation to the line by comparison. Not even close. The regulator doesn't care what causes the variations on its input, it just deals with them.

For a fuse to cause distortion or noise it would have to get past the transformer, filters and regulator. Each of those provides filtering and isolation from the power line.

Frequency response is entirely determined by the circuit parameters and has nothing to do with the power supply at all.

Perhaps this will help you see why this gets me rather riled up :evil: The maker and reviewers promoting these fuses are playing on the fact that the average audiophile does not know enough about electronics to decide for himself that the claims are ridiculous. The only reason for me to step into this quagmire is to inform the public that these fuses will cause damage in some situations and that the claims are just plain silly.

Pneumonic

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #176 on: 11 Jul 2014, 11:44 pm »
Hi, Scotty
Pneumonic, do all amplifiers sound the same?
Scotty

Only if the amp is "performing" (ie in your specific room, connected to your specific speaker cables while playing your specific music to your required SPL) with inaudible * errors in distortion (harmonic, noise and frequency response).  Objectively, it'll be transparent and, therefore, will contribute no audible change to the voltage signal supplied to them.

* There are numerous references to the finite hearing ability of humans insofar as hearing limits. Conservatively, the consensus being:

• Frequency response 20Hz-20kHz +/- 0.1dB
• Total harmonic distortion below – 85dB (0.01%) with all of the individual (crosstalk, modulation, alias, IMD) component spectra’s below -90dB.
• Total noise/jitter below -100dB with all of the individual noise/jitter components below -105dB.

Obviously I am presumptuous and believe that current measurement processes and instruments can measure all things that determine sound quality (in electronics anyhow not so speakers).

I freely acknowledge the "possibility" that components and elements of psychoacoustics (a study of science I have only cursory knowledge of) may well alter & impact hearing in ways that the above criteria can’t yet explain however, in the absence of science that refutes the limits noted above, I am certainly not in a position to question it.



Pneumonic

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #177 on: 11 Jul 2014, 11:51 pm »
Thanks for a well stated question. I will make this as plain as possible. Lets look at what does affect distortion, noise or frequency response.

Distortion is determined by the amplifying circuit and do a small extent the characteristics of the power supply. All circuits reject power supply noise and other effects to some extent.

People love to talk about the importance of power supplies so lets look at that. To see if a fuse can affect the power supply we have to look at what things affect the voltage. The voltage of your power supply is regulated in most preamps and all digital sources because it has to be.  Wide variations of line voltage are turned into very small variations by the regulator. A good regulator will reduce a 10 % line variation to less than 0.01 % or better. Some supplies reject input noise and variation by 100.000 to 1. Now while your regulator is dealing with these large variations in voltage input the fuse cannot add any significant variation to the line by comparison. Not even close. The regulator doesn't care what causes the variations on its input, it just deals with them.

For a fuse to cause distortion or noise it would have to get past the transformer, filters and regulator. Each of those provides filtering and isolation from the power line.

Frequency response is entirely determined by the circuit parameters and has nothing to do with the power supply at all.

Perhaps this will help you see why this gets me rather riled up :evil: The maker and reviewers promoting these fuses are playing on the fact that the average audiophile does not know enough about electronics to decide for himself that the claims are ridiculous. The only reason for me to step into this quagmire is to inform the public that these fuses will cause damage in some situations and that the claims are just plain silly.

Indeed, Roger. But it's even simpler.

If an EE were to describe his/her perfect audio reference it would very likely be a short, straight, piece of wire. Such a reference would be the perfect audio component for it would, when measured, exhibit no distortion, noise or frequency response error. 

Well, what is a fuse?  it is a short, straight, piece of wire. Therefore, it can't have effect on sound.
 

Freo-1

Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #178 on: 12 Jul 2014, 01:20 am »
Pneumonic, do all amplifiers sound the same?
Scotty


Not only no, but hell no!    :o

G Georgopoulos

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 1253
Re: Who makes amps with Class A bias?
« Reply #179 on: 12 Jul 2014, 01:24 am »
Indeed, Roger. But it's even simpler.

If an EE were to describe his/her perfect audio reference it would very likely be a short, straight, piece of wire. Such a reference would be the perfect audio component for it would, when measured, exhibit no distortion, noise or frequency response error. 

Well, what is a fuse?  it is a short, straight, piece of wire. Therefore, it can't have effect on sound.

Great posts Pneumonic..it stimulates the mind..
but i have to say this...
even a straight piece of wire can induce current (signal) as an antenna ...it is electric!!
now i leave you guys alone again..