0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 57670 times.
I know I've been eagerly waiting for other, more experienced folks to chime in to see if they share my findings (or if I have tin ears!) Very cool to be in agreement.
Phil,Also, your thoughts on the cost of cables is quite interesting. I realized connectors could be quite spendy, but I never really viewed the R&D cost of parts alone in that light. It adds significant legitimacy to the costs and makes it a bit easier to rationalize for those working on more traditional budgets.
Fred great post, I have been waiting for a few others to join the crowd too with higher end equipment than i posses and confirm our findings. Nice to see were on track and not being overly enthusiastic. heheI am a day ahead of you with adding another layer to the equation with the pre-out cable. I dont have 50 hrs on the cable yet but so far it is similiar to yours and Ed's evaluation of adding another layer of refinement but not like adding the first WyWire to the system as you mentioned. I feel like I am one step closer to being a fatigue free listener. Thank you Alex.
Ed,Interesting first thoughts. I'm jealous you are trying the speaker cable, but I've got the pre-amp to amp cable coming (hopefully tomorrow) so I'll be adding another layer to equation. Your general feeling regarding adding another Wywire to the equation is similar to mine. A definite top to bottom improvement, but not quite the revelation of merely getting a pair in the system. One interesting twist for you though: Wait a few days until you've gotten used to the sound and pull one of the Wywires out in favor of your old reference. At least in my case I learned I'd lost more than I realized I'd gained.
Ed,It is something, isn't it? I had to upgrade my comments after reverting myself. These things have been worth their weight in friggin plutonium!
I'm just glad I wasn't the only one who thought that!!! Phew!!! Ededit- I just had to add this...Alex took a huge risk by doing this test, a lot of cables were sent out to just see if they were good or not. I have had several folks PM me and ask "are they really that good"-YEP. I was naive and thought other folks on other forums might be interested to hear about these cables..so I posted on two sites-got banned from one and Alex and I both got flamed on the other...thank goodness Audiocircle is open to things like this...FWIW
Phil,Maybe we'll do that one day though I have to admit--my cable curiosity is quickly dissipating with these in place. How do you feel about the Wywire approach to different cable specifications for each application? It seems like sound logic, but I'm curious as to what you think as a cable builder yourself.
Are the pre-outs unflavored? Alex hadn't commented on which he was sending my way, but I assumed it was hot sauce. Either way, I'm sure it will be a further revelation and its going in between a tube pre and an ss amp, so either is appropriate.
Ed, I came across the flaming today--but you actually got banned somewhere for admitting your love for a product. Weak! Not the kind of forum I want to be a part of...Phil,Oh I definitely love the fact that he offers two different flavors, but I was more curious as to your thoughts on different spec cables for different applications. I.e. Alex makes a different RCA interconnect for between source and pre than for between pre and amp. He also makes a different high and low output phono cable. This approach makes a lot of sense to me, but I am curious as to why other cable manufacturers don't do the same. Its sound in logic, is it sound in science?
Alex told me that the pre-out cable would be unflavored, i am not sure if that goes for all of the pre-outs or not. Fred your in for another treat! Have fun.
Great Idea! Reminds me of the "Water Cables" somebody was doing a number of years ago. But don't you think the winding around the water bags would add inductance?