0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 112923 times.
I assume your comment about pushing him to be a stained glass artist is an inside joke - care to explain it?
I think the 4367 has the potential to be real close to the M2 but it's not a set system so could vary a lot more. Many benefits of the M2 are not going to be realized outside of a dedicated room, most non-dedicated rooms trash the ruler flat fr and the precise WG is also of less benefit. The M2 is a tool for production of audio first and foremost.
I think the 4367 has the potential to be real close to the M2 but it's not a set system so could vary a lot more. Many benefits of the M2 are not going to be realized outside of a dedicated room, most non-dedicated rooms trash the ruler flat fr and the precise WG is also of less benefit.
As far as I know, you can't [avoid the DAC/ADC].
If your source is a computer, you can. Buy one of these USB -> blu link converters.http://bssaudio.com/en-US/products/blu-usbFrom there You can run it into Crown DCIn amps, or one of the BSS processors and whatever other amps.
Speaker wire has arrived!
Your using copper clad aluminum lamp cord on a 20k speaker.
Dave,I completely disagree. A **properly** designed CD based loudspeaker allows the loudspeaker to perform very well in a non dedicated room and extremely well in a dedicated room. It's the reason CD even exists. Now the magic word is **properly**. Some of the finest loudspeakers I have heard do extremely well in the horizontal plane and have high and constant directivity indices, such as my Geddes NA 12 whose DI is flat from about 1khz to 10 kHz and is ~ 10dB. But that is not true of the NA12 in the vertical plane and to my knowledge, it hasn't been measured in oblique planes.The M2 is different. It has constant DI in the horizontal, vertical and oblique planes. It hits the nail completely on the head from about 800 Hz on up to about 8-10khz, at +/- 60 degrees. From a psychoacoustics standpoint this is exactly where an acoustical engineer wants to concentrate. If you pulled off a flat and constant DI in the horizontal plane there will be a raging applause. The fact that they did it in the other 2 planes is complete icing on the cake! From what Toole's research has shown this is also of benefit from a psychoacoustic standpoint. Of course, Geddes disagrees. JBL has the tools, the resources, the dedicated anechoic chambers and technical know how to execute this from what I am seeing. I haven't seen a loudspeaker that has been able to pull this off at such a price. The video that Richidoo linked above is quite informative and Mr. Sprinkle does go into some of those exacting details. It behooves one to watch it. One final point. The reason I have a dedicated room is because I can. Not because it's required. With a non-CD speaker it is absolutely required. The loudspeaker industry (most of which are non-CD designs) are driven by perception driven propaganda, hence the numerous glitzy shows, which is entertaining of course, but deceiving. I've tried hard to stop believing in the glamor myself. The M2 is quite refreshing in that regard. Best,Anand.
It's there a specific reason you don't use better cabling?
Yup, I understand all that but still stick to my comments. M2 is also much wider dispersion than most wg speakers and for them to perform as intended will require a dedicated room. I'm not saying you can't get great results for music listening without that, but that's not really the point. JBL went to great lengths to make them measure darn close to perfect so they can be the best tools possible for production of audio in a studio setting. If you throw them in a common living room some of that will be lost. I'm not sure how that's even debatable as measurements will easily confirm it. That also doesn't mean that the perfect measurements are all for nothing, of course it helps as this isn't black or white. But considerable complexity has been added to the M2 system to accomplish it's goals and make it a great tool, I wouldn't understand buying a speaker like this and not having a perfect room for them, because that's the point, technical perfection. If you're going to do something do it right. Putting M2s in a common living room is not "doing it right" imo.
I suppose it's good that you don't rely on others to validate your audio cred. It's there a specific reason you don't use better cabling?
Yep, you don't get it but that's fine. Enjoy!
Help me understand a bit better as to where you are coming from. Yes, the M2 does have a slightly wider horizontal dispersion than some other waveguides at 120 degrees. Are you implying that for this reason a purpose built listening room should be used?....I would rather have a loudspeaker with known polar data than a speaker with no data in a built room. I will have to do a few, if any, treatments to a room with good speakers. I will never be able to fix a loudspeaker based problem with a room based fix.