0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 57374 times.
Or, the marketing campaign was really good.
Here is a review of the B5's with a few measurements.http://noaudiophile.com/ELAC_B5/
Thanks for that review link. Not quite "These speakers know it out of the park" conclusion we were lead to believe.
You need a review up on your site of something you actually like or you will need to change your name to the negativeaudiophile
Also, his desktop set up is laughably configured for meaningful speaker assessment, with the wall so close to the right and, especially in light of that, zero toe in.
Inverse square law works wonders for near field monitoring setups.
I liked the B5, but they are not perfect and unlike all the other reviewers out there I'm willing to say what I think is wrong with them instead of the cop out line of "for the money"I think the JBL LSR305 and 308 are probably the best deals in audio at the moment, and I gave each of them mostly positive reviews.
Ohhh - it's you!! You may be no audiophile, but I think you need to try harder with your set ups. For another example, were the input terminals shorted in the subs that you used as speaker stands in the living room part of your review?
I'll bet you a beer that there is zero measurable difference in the bass response in the listening position if the subs are shorted or not.
Well you have the equipment; why not run a quick sweep and compare—with other speakers if you don't still have the B5s? I'd be curious if it was measurable, too, but it certainly is good test practice and easily done with an alligator clip jumper.
I guess you know that the effect is easily heard by finger-tapping the cones when shorted and not. Some subs are quite resonant, i.e., you hear a distinct frequency in response to a tap. Those would sing along to a nearby speaker. On the other hand, if the sub is connected to a decent amp with a good damping factor, then turning that amp on is almost as good as shorting the inputs.