Magnestand: made in America

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 69730 times.

Peter Gunn

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
    • Magnestand
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #160 on: 12 Aug 2012, 08:25 pm »
As for what PG says, take it with a grain of salt. Wood frames and a different crossover aren't going to affect the behavior of the motor - won't change 'speed' or efficiency. Replacing the wire with foil will impact both of those metrics (in opposite directions).

You're incorrect because you're looking at the issue the wrong way. Your comment assumes the environment this "motor" finds itself in is ideal. It is not, and that in fact is the entire problem. Lets consider a Porsche instead. How would it "motor" off road in mud? I imagine it's performance would be awful. However if you were to alter these less than ideal conditions  (going from off road mud to a flat, dry, smooth tarmac) would you not expect the speed and efficiency of your porsche to improve? 

This speaker is no different. As it comes it's essentially off road in mud. If you choose to believe what you hear is the limit of what it can do then IMHO you are very mistaken. Anything is only as good as the parameters it has to function under.

I also would caution everyone not to make grand assumptions about the full use of QR foil. IMHO it's the single worst thing magnepan ever did.

SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6440
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #161 on: 12 Aug 2012, 08:41 pm »
What objection do you have to the use of foil?
Their current line up of speakers sound better than anything they've done previously.

Seeing as how you're here, my offer from AA still stands - if you wish to send over a pair of your modified MMGs I will write up an unbiased review.  Maybe you have a pair of beaters kicking around? I'm pretty much impartial when it comes to things - it either sounds better or it doesn't.  It doesn't matter to me what the outcome is.
I can do regular MMGs, your modified ones, 1.7s and 3.7s and then do a little write up.

Send me a PM if you're interested, time to go walk Fido.
 

medium jim

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #162 on: 12 Aug 2012, 08:58 pm »
What objection do you have to the use of foil?
Their current line up of speakers sound better than anything they've done previously.

Seeing as how you're here, my offer from AA still stands - if you wish to send over a pair of your modified MMGs I will write up an unbiased review.  Maybe you have a pair of beaters kicking around? I'm pretty much impartial when it comes to things - it either sounds better or it doesn't.  It doesn't matter to me what the outcome is.
I can do regular MMGs, your modified ones, 1.7s and 3.7s and then do a little write up.

Send me a PM if you're interested, time to go walk Fido.

PG, Steve is as honest as they come and would write a true and candid report.  I'm lucky enough to be near a Magnepan Dealer and owned a pristine pair of 1.6QR's that were very good indeed.  Then I heard the new 1.7's and it is a different animal altogether....same for the 3.6 to 3.7's 

That said, I love my older 2.5's that had some delam issues that I repaired and have upgraded caps and they do everything I ask of them....stock frames and feet....

Jim

Rclark

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #163 on: 12 Aug 2012, 09:12 pm »
Have mine paired with Ncores right now and it is heaven on earth...

SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6440
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #164 on: 12 Aug 2012, 09:46 pm »
You finally got around to the Ncores you were so keen on, I see.
I'd be curious to see how they compared to the VTLs as retubing those things isn't a cheap proposition.  I've never heard anything I liked better than David Manley's handiwork but the rest of the world doesn't stand still, either.

Rclark

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #165 on: 12 Aug 2012, 09:51 pm »
my review should be up in about 4 days. But yeah, loving my 'stands. Good to see Peter Gunn here.

medium jim

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #166 on: 12 Aug 2012, 09:51 pm »
You finally got around to the Ncores you were so keen on, I see.
I'd be curious to see how they compared to the VTLs as retubing those things isn't a cheap proposition.  I've never heard anything I liked better than David Manley's handiwork but the rest of the world doesn't stand still, either.

At the end of the day, you only need to please yourself! 

Jim

SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6440
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #167 on: 12 Aug 2012, 09:55 pm »
And www.thetubestore.com as I figure that's where my 2016 tax refund is going.
Darling, you know that new kitchen you keep bugging me about, well...

medium jim

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #168 on: 12 Aug 2012, 11:01 pm »
Steve:

When I bought my Reissue VAC Marantz 9's, they still had the stock tube's, still strong and decent sounding.  But I wanted the best and that meant NOS Mullards XF2's and 6922's.  I figure I can get 10 years out of the Mullards if I'm lucky and 20 for the driver tubes. 

I'm already have 5 NOS Mullards in reserve and 3 more to go to have a full set in waiting. I guess I'm a bottlehead squirreling away tubes!
Ain't life grand!

Jim

Peter Gunn

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 24
    • Magnestand
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #169 on: 12 Aug 2012, 11:56 pm »
What objection do you have to the use of foil?
Their current line up of speakers sound better than anything they've done previously.

Seeing as how you're here, my offer from AA still stands - if you wish to send over a pair of your modified MMGs I will write up an unbiased review.  Maybe you have a pair of beaters kicking around? I'm pretty much impartial when it comes to things - it either sounds better or it doesn't.  It doesn't matter to me what the outcome is.
I can do regular MMGs, your modified ones, 1.7s and 3.7s and then do a little write up.

My objections to the full use of QR foil were made quite public on the Planar Asylum, and as a result my ability to speak was taken from me. (And others, and as a result that forum has all but died) If you're saying you don't know my reasons and I actually have the freedom to have an opinion and express it here, then let me know and I will tell you why I believe it was a huge mistake.

I also disagree very much with your next line. IMHO the 1.7 absolutely does not sound better than anything else they have previously done. In fact I consider it a sonic fraud. I'd take countless models over it any day.

I do not doubt you would be fair and objective in a review. I also do not doubt you'd be bouncing off the walls like Mr Clark is. There are some problems however. I have no "spares" to lend for one, and for two I have never been in need of customers and the ones I have have to wait long enough as it is, why make the line longer? Besides that I have been doing this a while now and frankly I have the desire to stop. As soon as I can arrange another method of income making I am finished. While I am grateful for the joy I have brought to many, the need to continually fight, argue and educate every mistaken notion audio is rife with about these speakers is a chore I have grown tired of.

The above example is proof enough. You think the 1.7 is the best incarnation of that model ever, I know it is the worst. Where can we even go from there? I fought savage battles on the planar asylum for years against people who said I was wrong, only to prove they were wrong and I was right, yet here again I find myself on the outside looking in.

I did what I did to please myself, not anyone else. I never intended to make a business out of it. The work is there, and it has been there long enough to speak for itself. Not a single claim I have ever made has been disproved. There are those who wish to ignore that fact, so be it. I can understand it somewhat, audio is full of snake oil but in this case they are the only ones harmed by dismissing my work, especially when they are free to copy it for themselves if they wish.

medium jim

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #170 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:21 am »
Man, I truly hope that the mentality of the AA doesn't start up here.  It is clear that PG has a loyal following, that's great.  But there are many that don't espouse to the same beliefs about Magnepan's as he does.

PG, since you're very secure in your business and such, why do you feel compelled to push yourself on everyone who has a different opinion?

The lowly 1.7's were just honored with an Golden Ear from the Absolute Sound.  I guess the whole audiophile world has been duped if we are to believe you.  I choose to believe my ears and found the 1.7 and 3.7's to be superior to their related 1.6/3.6's.  Yet, I find the Magnepan's from the 1980's to be their best sonically (Personal Preference).

Please keep the fighting and arguing away from the Planar Circle!

Jim

TONEPUB

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #171 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:41 am »
Having heard Mr. Gunn's speakers on a few occasions, I'd vouch for his work for whatever that's worth. Just adding the mass to the frame and getting those cheapo caps out of the crossover works wonders for the Magnepans, no matter which model you own.

Magnepan uses notoriously inexpensive components in the rest of the speaker (mainly crossover) because their frugal nature leads them to believe that premium parts don't make a difference.  Magnepan's own Wendell Diller has told me this on more than one occasion.

I'm sure plenty of people besides myself have suggested that Magnepan approach the concept of a "Premium" model and a standard one, but I know first hand Magenpan wants no part of it.

However, though this is the Magnepan taken to the ultimate (and I tend to agree with Mr. Gunn in terms of the current product vs. older in terms of lifelike sound) they still come up short vs. a full range electrostatic speaker, because the diaphragm is much heavier. Also, they still have a crossover network, with the associated anomalies that a full range speaker does not have.

I don't know if I'd go as far to say the new 1.7/3.7/20.7's are a "sonic fraud", but I would say they have gone towards a more audiophile sound than a musically natural sound.  That certainly will attract some and detract others.

All that being said, the Magnepans are great speakers.  I've owned quite a few over the years and have always enjoyed them. They also remain one of the best buys in audio these days.

SteveFord

  • Facilitator
  • Posts: 6440
  • The poodle bites, the poodle chews it.
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #172 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:48 am »
It wasn't a trick question: why was it a huge mistake?
They're selling all the .7 models they can make and they're continually getting accolades in the press.

You're entitled to your opinion but I had both the 1.6s and 1.7s side by side here at home. 
I sold the 1.6s if that tells you anything. 
I then sold the 3.6s and went with 3.7s because they sounded better to me. 
I didn't upgrade just because I was bored.  The sound was more coherent to my ears.

What happens on other sites stays there. 
I'm a bit more hands on that other moderators so things are kept civil here. 

I don't think anyone bounces off the walls quite like our intrepid man on the scene, RClark! :D
I offered to give a review as I have a bit more experience with this stuff than he does.  Yes, that means I'm old (or so my wife enjoys telling me).

Tonepub,
They know their market really well and have a very sound business model. 
They could do some stuff differently (and I've suggested as much but I don't own the place).
However, I appreciate being able to actually afford their product instead of just drooling over a picture.

medium jim

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #173 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:50 am »
Having heard Mr. Gunn's speakers on a few occasions, I'd vouch for his work for whatever that's worth. Just adding the mass to the frame and getting those cheapo caps out of the crossover works wonders for the Magnepans, no matter which model you own.

Magnepan uses notoriously inexpensive components in the rest of the speaker (mainly crossover) because their frugal nature leads them to believe that premium parts don't make a difference.  Magnepan's own Wendell Diller has told me this on more than one occasion.

I'm sure plenty of people besides myself have suggested that Magnepan approach the concept of a "Premium" model and a standard one, but I know first hand Magenpan wants no part of it.

However, though this is the Magnepan taken to the ultimate (and I tend to agree with Mr. Gunn in terms of the current product vs. older in terms of lifelike sound) they still come up short vs. a full range electrostatic speaker, because the diaphragm is much heavier. Also, they still have a crossover network, with the associated anomalies that a full range speaker does not have.

I don't know if I'd go as far to say the new 1.7/3.7/20.7's are a "sonic fraud", but I would say they have gone towards a more audiophile sound than a musically natural sound.  That certainly will attract some and detract others.

All that being said, the Magnepans are great speakers.  I've owned quite a few over the years and have always enjoyed them. They also remain one of the best buys in audio these days.

I agree that upgrading the caps is important and is worth the money.   I also agree that the older Maggies are more natural sounding or life like, but again, this is personal preference.   I could easily live with a pair of 3.7's.   

Understand, Wendell Diller and the Magnepan Family is about offering affordable made in USA Speakers that in their stock presentation are wonderful.   Adding $300.00 worth of parts in the Crossover network make them world class.  I would hazzard to bet that less than 5% of the Magnepan's ever get modified and those 95% who don't, love them as there is no other speaker in their price points that can complete with them. 

Jim

rw@cn

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 336
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #174 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:52 am »
PG,

I have read a good number of your posts over the years. A little humility and diplomacy would benefit you enormously. I haven't heard any of your products but have read the many rave reviews posted by Gunned Maggie owners. I would be eager to read a review written by someone that wasn't embroiled in the bitter and nauseating battle of words over your products. I think you owe it to yourself to end this "war" once and for all.

Sincerely,

RW

josh358

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1231
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #175 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:54 am »
I still haven't heard the 1.7's, but I'd say the 3.7's are a significant improvement over the 3.6. Of course, they've changed more than the quasi ribbons, but QR drivers have real technical and audible advantages in the mids and highs, which is why most planar drivers are now made with them, whatever the manufacturer -- Magnepan, BG, Eminent Tech, etc. And all of the reviews of which I'm aware have found/said the same, as well as most people online.

I think we have to respect those whose impressions are different from our own. This is doubly true in subjective audio. While I can point to measurements, I don't know how to "prove" that the QR's sound better. I can only express my opinion about what I've heard, or mention the opinions of others.

It is possible to argue against certain *technical* claims. But even there, where there is an objective right and wrong, none of us can claim to be omniscient.

Rclark

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #176 on: 13 Aug 2012, 12:55 am »
And dont stop your work Peter! The world needs you!

TONEPUB

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #177 on: 13 Aug 2012, 01:00 am »
Hi Steve:

I guess I'd disagree with you on Magenpan moving into the 21st century terribly well. I've talked to plenty of dealers around the world that have all told me Magnepan continues to be a tougher sell every year.  Back when I bought my first pair in the late 70's, they were pretty unique.  Today, you can get a box speaker that sounds pretty good and looks good too. 

But the new speakers have been well received.  We gave them a good review as well. I would agree with you that the coherence of the new speakers is better because of the all ribbon design.  I'm guessing that's why many like the earlier models so much - the panels were all the same materials, so you don't get the sense of sound coming from a separate woofer, tweeter and midrange.  So in that direction the .7 models are an improvement.

As I said, I think it's more of a different than a better. And I still feel they offer tremendous value for the money, however even since the 70's I've always felt the Magnepan was a great inexpensive speaker that really needs an expensive amplifier to shine.

I've been floored by just how good the MMG's, .6 and .7 speakers have been when hooked up to my Pass XA200.5's, Burmester 911 mk. 3 or Octave Signature mono blocks.  The speakers are scary good with world class electronics.

But so much of this is personal taste and hardly worth getting grumpy about.  Magnepan certainly has a loyal following.

And Jim:

Excellent point.  Remember $300 worth of caps at build, equates to $1200 - $2000 at retail, effectively doubling the cost of a pair of 1.7's.  So, I fully understand why they do what they do.

rw@cn

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 336
Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #178 on: 13 Aug 2012, 01:02 am »
Having heard Mr. Gunn's speakers on a few occasions, I'd vouch for his work for whatever that's worth. Just adding the mass to the frame and getting those cheapo caps out of the crossover works wonders for the Magnepans, no matter which model you own.

Magnepan uses notoriously inexpensive components in the rest of the speaker (mainly crossover) because their frugal nature leads them to believe that premium parts don't make a difference.  Magnepan's own Wendell Diller has told me this on more than one occasion.

I'm sure plenty of people besides myself have suggested that Magnepan approach the concept of a "Premium" model and a standard one, but I know first hand Magenpan wants no part of it.

However, though this is the Magnepan taken to the ultimate (and I tend to agree with Mr. Gunn in terms of the current product vs. older in terms of lifelike sound) they still come up short vs. a full range electrostatic speaker, because the diaphragm is much heavier. Also, they still have a crossover network, with the associated anomalies that a full range speaker does not have.

I don't know if I'd go as far to say the new 1.7/3.7/20.7's are a "sonic fraud", but I would say they have gone towards a more audiophile sound than a musically natural sound.  That certainly will attract some and detract others.

All that being said, the Magnepans are great speakers.  I've owned quite a few over the years and have always enjoyed them. They also remain one of the best buys in audio these days.

Jeff,

I am going to read your Magnepan reviews again and carefully compare them to this post and some of your post on MLOC. There seems to be some equivocation or contradiction here. This post is intriguing and tends to match some ideas that I have been considering.

medium jim

Re: Magnestand: made in America
« Reply #179 on: 13 Aug 2012, 01:06 am »
Hi Steve:

I guess I'd disagree with you on Magenpan moving into the 21st century terribly well. I've talked to plenty of dealers around the world that have all told me Magnepan continues to be a tougher sell every year.  Back when I bought my first pair in the late 70's, they were pretty unique.  Today, you can get a box speaker that sounds pretty good and looks good too. 

But the new speakers have been well received.  We gave them a good review as well. I would agree with you that the coherence of the new speakers is better because of the all ribbon design.  I'm guessing that's why many like the earlier models so much - the panels were all the same materials, so you don't get the sense of sound coming from a separate woofer, tweeter and midrange.  So in that direction the .7 models are an improvement.

As I said, I think it's more of a different than a better. And I still feel they offer tremendous value for the money, however even since the 70's I've always felt the Magnepan was a great inexpensive speaker that really needs an expensive amplifier to shine.

I've been floored by just how good the MMG's, .6 and .7 speakers have been when hooked up to my Pass XA200.5's, Burmester 911 mk. 3 or Octave Signature mono blocks.  The speakers are scary good with world class electronics.

But so much of this is personal taste and hardly worth getting grumpy about.  Magnepan certainly has a loyal following.

And Jim:

Excellent point.  Remember $300 worth of caps at build, equates to $1200 - $2000 at retail, effectively doubling the cost of a pair of 1.7's.  So, I fully understand why they do what they do.

TONEPUB:

Still, I'm surprised that in their flagship 20.7's that they didn't go with better X/O's and they still could have been under 15K, but again, the 20.7's are amazingly good as they are. 

I agree that Magnepan's need top shelf amplification to sparkle and get you into the sweet spot.  It's more than watts to get the spl, rather the quality of the watts to get the detail and coherence.

Jim