0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 18822 times.
Then Webster's is defining music very narrowly in a way that most musicians would not accept. For example, there is a very large body of Avant Garde and underground music that doesn't conform to any particular convention. Much of it is freely improvised, and for fans that is its greatest appeal.--Jerome
By the name of the band, I would not listen to the trash.
QuoteAlso check out The New Pornographers "Together". Lots of melody.By the name of the band, I would not listen to the trash.
Also check out The New Pornographers "Together". Lots of melody.
Good reversal of the curmudgeon thread.
Then throw your dictionary out of the window. Words (and their meanings) then mean nothing. Text away.
I don't know what edition of Webster's dictionary you are using...but here is just one definition among many that is less rigid and exclusive than you seem to believe it to be.--Jerome
Someone suggested that I try a band called Radiohead (OK computer). They said if you liked Pink Floyd, you'd dig this band. Well, I think not. There not even in the same league. Wayner
Wow! Enough of the etymological flogging. Music has always been socially and culturally based. One person's music always has the potential to be another person's noise. Give it a rest and go listen to whatever you enjoy!Cheers,Geary