0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 17348 times.
To geezers like Wayner and me, corporate musical outlets that control the mainstream media flow of what's hip and current are promoting a product that doesn't have much in common with what we grew up thinking pop or rock music should sound like. I think there's plenty of interesting music still being made that isn't a synthetic aural concoction. We just don't hear it anymore in the context of radio, MTV, and the usual outlets anymore.
May I also add another layer to the thread. I try to live by this old saying:YOU ARE THE COMPANY YOU KEEP.W
Soon the boundaries of any definition will be eroded away, and a fart will also be considered "music" (especially if there is a series of farts).
Now that you mention it...I won't include a link to sound samples, but yes this is real, and yes you can find it on Amazon.com. (And yes, it is music. Just not music that I care to hear).--Jerome
Webster defines music as having melody, harmony and rhythm, but there seems to be lots of music that seems to be missing a melody.
Then I guess an old tree that falls in the woods one day produces harmonics of some type, plus there is a rhythm element to the crash and the subsequent reverberation within the woods can now be described as "music". So what we are really saying is that anarchy has also hit the definitions of music. Soon the boundaries of any definition will be eroded away, and a fart will also be considered "music" (especially if there is a series of farts).I once brought to my college music professor a copy of Emerson, Lake and Palmer's "Pictures at an Exhibition" (Mussorgrsky), and he felt that this was the greatest insult to music the world had ever seen. How the times have changed.Wayner
If I say Crimson and Clover, or Groovin' or how about California Dreamin' or even Owner of a Lonely Heart, I bet that almost everyone could easily come up with the melody. ..............There are several bands, groups or even individuals, that I'm sure if I heard the song 100 times, I couldn't hum 3 notes of the melody (because there isn't one).
Have you ever come home after an exhausting day and turned on music to relax your nerves? While you are taking it easy, your auditory cortex is not. It works hard to synthesize the several musical elements of rhythm, pitch, frequency, and timbre to create a rich auditory experience.First, a discussion of the ear physiology is needed. Vibrating air moving at different frequencies hits the eardrum which causes the middle ear's three bones to move accordingly. The stapes, one of these inner ear bones hits on the oval window of the inner ear, and because the inner ear is filled with fluid, the bulging of the oval window causes this fluid to slosh around. The round window, also in the inner ear, compensates for the increased pressure by bulging outward. The inner ear has two functions, to transduce sound via the cochlea and to maintain a person's vertical position with respect to gravity via the vestibular system (1). . But here, we will only consider the transduction of sound. The cochlea is filled with hair cells that are extremely sensitive and depolarize with only slight perturbations of the inner ear fluid. At the point of depolarization, a neural signal is transmitted and on its way to the brain. This nerve impulse travels to the auditory nerve (8th cranial nerve), passes through the brainstem, and then reaches the branched path of the cochlear nucleus: the ventral cochlear nucleus or the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The nerve signal that passes through the ventral cochlear nucleus will reach the superior olive in the medulla where differences in timing and loudness of sound are compared, and location of the sound's origin is pinpointed (1). The nerve signal that crosses the dorsal cochlear nucleus ultimately is analyzed for sound quality.As seen in the final step of sound transduction, the information relayed by the neural signal branches and processing occurs at different sights. No consensus has been reached as to where music is processed in the brain. Most researchers agree that the different components of music are processed in different parts of the brain, as exemplified by the branching pathway of the cochlear nucleus which facilitates the separation of sound timing and loudness with the sound quality analysis. But this information is not sufficient to answer the question of where our sense of music originates.Frackwiak has supplied a small part of the puzzle. He conducted a study in which he had his subjects listened to different music tapes. When they listened to familiar music, the PET scan showed that the Broca's area was activated (2)., an area that is mostly associated with speaking. The rhythm tape also activated the Broca's area which can be explained by the fact that it also processes the cadence of spoken language (2).. When the timbre tape was played the right hemisphere of the brain was activated. This finding is often challenged by studies that show the left brain is activated. The pitch tape stimulated the left back side of the brain in an area called Precuneus which is associated with visual imagery (2). Frackwiak's study does not seem conclusive.More compelling arguments better integrate the physiology of the ear with specific characteristics of music, and therefore eliminate the overlap of music and language processing. As mentioned in the description of sound transduction, the cochlea houses hair cells which depolarize to transduce sound information to the brain. These hair cells are actually organized like keys on the piano, sensitive to frequencies from low to high. When sound information reaches the auditory cortex, the neurons located there are also organized in this pattern of increasing frequency (3).The implication of this built-in pattern in the brain is exciting because it suggests that the auditory system in humans is almost a complete replication of the natural phenomena of frequency variations. The twelve sites for music perception in the auditory cortex makes the system equally as complicated as language processing. The part of Frackwiak's study that exposed subjects to familiar music suggests that neurons "learn" to recognize tones and the groups of tones that work together. Depending on the culture in which an individual grows up in, the auditory system learns that culture's reoccurring musical themes (3). Therefore memory is closely related to music appreciation. Because neurons are programmed to remember musical patterns, the brain develops a "musical template". This template provides the listener with certain preconception of what music should be like. Thus a listener will expect certain frequencies to go well together (4). So this means that if a person hears dissonance in music, he/she will expect a following note that resolves the dissonance (4). This expectation of the sequence of notes draws on the frequency memory template in the auditory cortex.Jessica Brock, Bryn Mawr College
In a nutshell, what do studies of the aging brain reveal aboutL2 acquisition and processing? From the cognitive literature, welearn that the associative memory and incremental learning elementsof language learning are steadily compromised by age, asare the working memory and processing speed components of languageprocessing and production. It appears that these declinesare linear and that they begin in early adulthood and continuethroughout the life span.David Birdsong, University of Texas at Austin
This is purely my conjecture and not proven scientifically although I piece together findings from several scientific studies.Thesis: Musical appreciation depends on neural conditioning in our formative years and non-conforming music becomes more difficult to appreciate as we get older. I base this on the following theories:1. Music appreciation involving 12 auditory cortex works in similar fashion to that of language processing in the brain and musical grammar and diction are learned during our formative years.2. L2 or Second language acquisition (in non dominant L2 situation) suffers as we age.3. Likewise, M2 (Second music) acquisition suffers in linear fashion as we age. Sequence of notes that do not match existing templates in our neural network are not recognized as enjoyable music. It gets more difficult as we age to acquire new templates.
