0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 25469 times.
. . . floating shields by leaving pins 6 and 7 out of ground, is that right?
does anyone know Joshs e-mail address/paypal account details so I can pay for the transformers. please dont post these details - send me a PM.thany-you
OK, so who is going to organize the group buy from ATI Research.
Reverie,Since you're Euro based, these might be of interest... http://www.hifi2000.it/default.asp?Langid=1 Haven't seem them myself but, excellent reports from buyers at DIYAudio.
I've got enough modded Squeezeboxes around the house that it will be possible to compare floating shield versions to locally grounded versions.
And the winner is - float the shield. I find that the soundstage seems a bit more natural this way.
If this is a ticket of different version of SC947-02 mod I will try in my other SB3. Have you tried it in your DAC too?
Quote from: tanchiro58 on 22 Apr 2007, 04:34 pmIf this is a ticket of different version of SC947-02 mod I will try in my other SB3. Have you tried it in your DAC too? Tan,I don't have the 947-02 transformers - I'm using the older 916 transformers. The two units that I compared had 1)floating shield vs. 2)shield hooked to the local ground. I didn't try hooking the shield to a remote ground like you did.But I definitely found that the floating shield was musical. I didn't hear much difference in dynamics - as I mentioned in the earlier message the biggest difference was a bigger soundstage. The floating shield version seemed to be better at making the speakers disappear.----Gary
But I definitely found that the floating shield was musical. I didn't hear much difference in dynamics