0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 484455 times.
McMaster Carr has copper-Nicole nuts. The amp needs a washer per post, you can get plastic ones from them, too. I found some actual copper nuts for tattoo guns, but they're funky and may not fit.
Jackman came by yesterday and we had a chance to compare the XLS with and without the iTube in the chain. First off, we weren't hearing any negative impact of having it in the chain. And three main positive contributions were present: 1) better imaging (again, not a strength of my system). The main contribution to the imaging was from the tube itself; impact of the 3d circuit was noticeable but small. 2) the sound was also more fleshed out with the tube. More meat on the bones. A bit richer. 3) The sound was less fatiguing. Not that the XLS was overly fatiguing, but with the tube not in the system my Spider Sense was telling me that could be an issue during long listening sessions or with certain poorly mastered recordings.
Everything will improve once the Itube is cryo'd. It will almost double the performance.And I found this interesting tidbit from a Tannoy review. Cryo could become the wave of the future for loudspeaker components if companies follow what Tannoy is doing. http://dagogo.com/tannoy-prestige-canterbury-gold-reference-speakers-reviewAccording to Tannoy, they didn’t just improve the visual aesthetics, but made significant improvements by developing “new cone materials, new high frequency compression diaphragms, upgraded crossovers and extensive use of Deep Cryogenic Treatment” on Prestige GR models. I can tell you that this isn’t just hyperbole, because I have heard the end product.
That's pretty cool Tom, thanks for the link.Did you also get the power supply for the itube cryoed or was it just the itube?
I had a TPA3116 with Elna Silmic II caps, Blackgate N input caps (all 4), and a nice PSU that made a substantial difference like the caps. Another one I put into a little box for a ceramic studio with some speakers that were free. My understanding is OSCON's on the 3116 might bring the detail around to be comparable to the XLS; prior to, even with good caps, I didn't get the detail when I gave an XLS a few tracks. Overall I don't think the TPA3116 is nearly as good. But we're talking about a much less powerful amplifier so it doesn't necessarily matter to anyone. My TPA3116 sounded good, but it just didn't have the authority, the feeling of force. It lacked life for me. The character of the music wasn't as prevalent. It performs well, measures well, etc, but wasn't an amp I knew I could indefinitely feel a form of satisfaction with.
I recently brought home a Crown XLS 2500 and have been burning it in. Currently feeding it from a DB Systems pre-amp. Sounds very good so far. This week I will be upgrading the woofers of my ESS AMT-1 Towers with Eminence Legend BP-102-4 10" four ohm drivers. While I am inside the speakers I will be replacing the caps on the XO.Has anyone tried using an Oppo BDP-105 or a Sony HAP-1ZES as a source directly into a Crown XLS using XLR connectors?
... but I did rest it on a Gibson Les Paul case which made it more musical.I couldn't resist.
Which VTL's are you comparing it to ......the refinement comment is interesting, it is one of the major differences between just good and really good stuff ...