0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 98408 times.
Onoz $100 fuses. And the French think Quentin Tarantino is a genius. There's no justice in the world, I tell ya. None at all.
Who's Quentin Tarantino?
An overrated fuse. That keeps blowing.
I know people at PFO and am crafting an email to one of them to comment on the review and make some suggestions on how they can better serve their readers. Maybe it will help, or maybe not.I would hope that Roger could email Ted Denney and have a designer-to-designer chat with him. At which point we may get closer to the truth.
Transient power is directly related to how the amp transformer reacts to the local neighbourhood transformer. Everything in between your amp transformer and that local neighbourhood transformer is going to be important. Including power cords, outlets, house fuse boxes, AMP FUSES, location to the local transformer., time of day and neighbourhood draw on power. Literally everything. This whole discussion and its opposing views looks like people's under appreciation of how important the local neighbourhood transformer is. That neighbourhood transformer is very much apart of your home audio system. The way your system interacts is crucial to how your stereo/home theatre will sound.
The notion a fuse can not be improved beyond what .50 cents wields is beyond me. Yes maybe $50 usd is a bit much, but what if it was $25? Is that too much too? Is it price or is the actual improvement that pisses flat-Earthers off? All it needs to be is more responsive (less resistive) while it maintains a rated blow current. Thats it! You can't tell me this isn't possible? Everything else in front of a transformer has proven to be beneficial to soundstage. Including power cables, outlets, fuse box improvements. Fuses seem to be in line with this group. Sorry impedance rules here and how the fuse drops the impedance the amp transformer sees right down to local neighbourhood transformer. Sorry, but complaining about an audio reviewer isn't going to change that.
Please keep in mind that I measured the voltage drop across a 2 amp fuse to be less than 0.2 volts. Your line varies several volts. Even if you reduce the fuse drop to zero you haven't done anything significant. Yes, impedance rules and the fuse is insignificant.If you want a better example think of how this 0.1 or even 0.5 ohm fuse figures into the primary of a CD player or preamp transformer whose DC resistance is 40 ohms. Again we are talking about millivolts drop, the change in that drop being even less. I've got bigger fish to fry to even bother with something so insignificant.What we are trying to do here is provide a little resistance (haha) to the flood of unwarranted press these fuses are getting. It's never easy to go against the tide but there are times when reasonable people have to speak up, otherwise this hobby we love loses all respect.I have a Tesla Coil and if I could set up a booth at the show and get $50 for treating a 50 cent fuse I would be a wealthy man but not able to sleep at night.
On an amp it would be the slo blow rating that enables transient power. Measuring the fuse after the rated current in working state into an unregulated power supply?
Then why does my 14B use a slow blow fuse? Transient current draw into the power supply is common. Peak momentary current draw at the outlet can be 20 to 30 amps on a working un regulated power supply. Bottlenecking those transients is not what you want to do. Crap power cords, lousy house wiring, etc nerfs power supply outputs. It all shows up in the soundstage.
The Psychological community has explained why you hear what you hear. Believers just choose to ignore them.Doc
Don't think this is correct. Amps don't draw "transient power" from the wall. Transient power (well, ALL power to the signal amplifying parts) in an amp are provided by the power supply (transformer and capacitor bank) unless we're talking about OTL amps, but I you know I mean. Amps continuously draw power from the wall......like continuously topping off a small pool being filled by the ocean. The pool is the amp's power supply. The ocean is the power station.
It likely uses a slow blow so that it can tolerate the power in-rush when the amp is turned on from a cold state, while the power supply is being filled (to use my pool analogy again) and stabilizes.
I don't feel the "pool of electrons" analogy is correct, even for class A amps. The transfer of power is direct despite devices like caps and coils that can store energy and this also explains why everything that has to do with power delivery becomes audible, even fuses. In essence, werd's description is much closer to my actual experience and the "pool of electrons" analogy does not match up with what I actually hear and experience.
There are peer-reviewed psychology studies on audio comparisons between components and/or gear? I didn't know that. Where are they?
Well this condition is described right in my 14B manual. Knowing Bryston (to not resort to hyperbole) especially when describing safe operation in amps. Under power conditioning. http://bryston.com/products/power_amps/14BSST-2.html
Pretty sure my analogy isn't far off the mark. The power doesn't go straight from the wall to an amp's output devices in any case I've ever seen. Perhaps the power supply "pool" is small or less efficient in some amps, so any time there's a significant depletion in electrons, it is noticeable (though not necessarily clipping the amp). Now, I'm not disregarding anyone's personal experience with what they hear and experience. I'm just trying to make sense of / clear up things a bit.