0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 14220 times.
I recently changed one thing that's absolutely blowing me away – I dropped the transition frequency between my 3.7s and subs to 40Hz. My, oh my, can I dial in a serious foundation now! The valves haven't registered any complaints about the extra work and neither have the Maggies. The only frustrating thing is the inconsistency from album to album. I have yet to incorporate a solution which affords level adjustment from my listening chair – a situation in need of redress. I'd really like to build a more specific crossover now, but I also decided to take on a couple new woodworking projects. I'm not the fastest gun in the west, but I enjoy fiddling around with this stuff
Safest maybe but easiest? IMHO we might be talking about snipe hunting with this endeavor. I don't even know that it there is any substance to it. And I only recently learned that there actually is something called a snipe...Cute, yes?It never ocurred to me to use a relay that way but it would be a way of doing it. I might even be able to do a DIY one. The only reason I have any interest in it is that it is somewhat controversial and it seems like it would be pretty easy to take it off of the table as a factor. But how to do it without making it an enormous waste of time? I'll look around on Wima's literature for their X2 caps or find a predesigend filter that uses them this way I suppose. As for the speaker fuses... Perhaps a .1 to a .47 uF would be sufficient for the purpose? Or I could just replace everything with a handful of 15A fuses for an evening and assume there will not be an event for the test period.I so look forward to the days when I have the time and enrgy to teach myself to be a DIYer. (is that a word?) I can play part time hack for now and I have no idea why I find it so entertaining.
It's a lot of fun, isn't it? So much so that I ended up doing it for a living.
Yesterday I had a Winged "C" 6550 decide to go "Good-Bye Cruel World" and it made me think of this thread. I know it's about resistors but fuses kind of crept in somewhere along the line.At any rate, the fuse in the amp took the hit but I do find the fuses in the speakers comforting. I'd rather they pop than a ribbon.Josh, Are you still working in the audio field?
I confess that I'm a conservative when it comes to speaker fuses, but that Hafler manual pretty much reinforces what I'd thought. I think I'd want to try it first, preferably in some kind of blind test, before I'd take the risk with my own speakers. It's not that I blow fuses these days, but accidents do happen.
Bass is like that isn't it? It seems like a foundation for the rest of the spectrum. You sound like you are pretty happy with the remodel. You have that 'Got something accomplished' glow in your writing.
Yesterday I had a Winged "C" 6550 decide to go "Good-Bye Cruel World" and it made me think of this thread. I know it's about resistors but fuses kind of crept in somewhere along the line.At any rate, the fuse in the amp took the hit but I do find the fuses in the speakers comforting. I'd rather they pop than a ribbon.
That article had something to say about using fuses with higher ratings as well. I may be nuts, but I think that might be a possibility as long as the melting time of the fuse is commensurately reduced. Thus, the current through the fuse stays further from the fuse's melting point, but the fuse still protects the ribbons by virtue of its reduced reaction time – perhaps even better than the factory implementation. I dunno – seems possible. Listening without fuses is inspiring me to seek a better fusing solution.
Basically by accident. It was after college and I was happily sitting around doing nothing, so happily in fact that when my mother met a guy who ran a sound studio at a party and he mentioned that he was looking for someone she said "Hire my son!" So much for job fairs, eh? It was never like work. I mean, there was a lot of pressure and long hours, but basically it was lots of toys and million dollar budgets to spend on your hobby.
It's awesome to get deep, deep bass without any boominess anywhere higher. The problem is that there is just so much variation from recording to recording. Lowering the crossover point allows me to bring out what got tweezed down without over-emphasizing what was left alone. Yeah, I'm pretty excited. This is what I want but it would be neat to be able to control the levels from where I sit.
for finding that.I couldn't agree more Kevin. Given the choice why do without? Bass is FUN!I have had a somewhat similar experience trying to get the superior bass I would like. Although what I have is pretty satisfying I believe there is room for improvement. I'm not really having the level match problem that you describe. I have had more of a perceived variance with bass definition. Some days it sounds just about perfect and other days there is a loss of vividness to it. And it is on the same tracks. This perplexes me a bit and I'm not sure how to address it. Since I forsee new subs in the future I'll focus on that another day.