ok here goes: taking James's words into account about gain setting , i tried both balanced and unbalanced connection between the BDA1 and the BP26 respectively. (Can't have both balanced at the same time because of lack of double outs or passthrough....)
the difference is remarkable: the air, the ambiance, the whole soundstage, when connected Balanced, the BHA1 and the HD800 really sing, I would describe it best as 'life'. Being there. Have tried meticulously to adjust the volume level to see if it was not just that, but must come to the conclusion Balanced is the way to go. (and I still haven't even got my balanced headphone cable). O boy, what a luscious couple this makes. Mellow, sparkling, full-bodied and honest. You can almost see, feel and 'touch' the musicians. It's all there!
Which of course poses the feared and dreaded dilemma: I (we) need the balanced connection in normal (speaker) setup too, for all the same reasons .... James, though the tape-in connection on the bp26 is a viable option for the BHA1, Balanced really is the way to go. ( To save the Balanced out for the Bha1, i tried the unbalanced out on the BDA1 too, but that still leads to the same conclusion...)
Couldn't you make some kind of small switchbox that concurs with Bryston demands and specifics, and allows for switching (not splitting) a balanced signal into different (BHA1 and BP26 in my case for now, but ymmv) amps?
Then your customers could enjoy both worlds of music-playing walhalla.
Cheers, and fingers crossed,
Marius
Will experiment further, especially considering that the BHA1/hd800 might be a much more revealaing combo than the BP26/ESl. Thus emphasizing the difference between Balanced/Unbalanced, which would be a reason to use the Balanced connection for the BHA1 for now and leave the Bp26 with the unbalanced?