In all the posts here that claim unbalanced operation is better I do not see that anyone has compared balanced and unbalanced connectivity performance on the same device, only that a device featuring unbalanced connectivity was used with satisfying result, which cannot be the base for conclusion that unbalanced operation is better, I think anyone can see through this false logic.
Claims from some manufacturers that the decision to go with unbalanced connectivity only was based purely on performance due to simplicity is very questionable, it has more to do with keeping the cost down than anything else and again cannot be the base for conclusion that unbalanced operation is better.
There are many manufacturers beside Bryston that provide both balanced and unbalanced connectivity, and many of them are not of professional heritage, yet I do not know of a single one that claims balanced is not the better performer.
This is a recurring theme on these forums, conclusions drawn on insufficient information, experience and hearsay. If an owner of a particular technology/component suggests that it is fine performer and expresses satisfaction with it, then it can be considered an opinion and nothing more. When such person claims that a particular technology/component provides better performance yet has no experience with something else that is the subject of contention, and at the same time does not have any technical data or knowledge to substantiate such claims, then such claims are completely baseless from both subjective and objective perspective.