0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 4371 times.
I have owned VMPS RM2s, and the larger subwoofer.The larger subwoofer (with low xmax chinese drivers) was a 'no brainer': I sent it back. It made ludicrous rattling noises when being driven by the low level output of the Velodyne SDS1, an equalization system, at 40 -30 htz. Brian said in response that this was why he didn't listen to test patterns (but he did take them back with full credit, minus shipping). The RM2, were more difficult. But ultimately I longed for something more real, and accurate and dynamic, and with a more precise soundstage, e.g. with a sound approximating 'live'. And now that I have it (sorry, I won't say what 'it' is here), I won't look back in the VMPS direction. I think the problem is those midrange drivers, but it could be more, including the outdated, low excursion woofers.Or, perhaps i just did not have enough patience, adjusting the knobs in the back, I'll never no!But now I do now know what accurate sound can do:it is exciting!
Eminence! Well, let's hope Brian has changed them completely. They do 'pro' subs, that generally don't have to go below 50 htz, and never, to my knowledge, have.
As an owner of a Smaller Sub for many, many years (admittedly, several of those years it was in storage, just due to space considerations), I haven't had any complaints. It does have the original woven carbon fiber Megawoofers, however (vs. whatever drivers you apparently had experience with). I just wanted to give full disclosure before I say this -- it seems to me you have some type of agenda, here. If you had a problem with VMPS speakers, that's fine. . .but you are definitely handling the situation in a poor fashion, especially when you are making subtle attacks on a product/driver you implicitly have no knowledge about.Paul