0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 14995 times.
I used to be about 90/10 HT to music. Then I got Salk speakers and that all changed. Now I am about 40/60. The movies are great but the music is compelling.
I am very curious to hear your estimated percentagedifference between HT2-TLs and the SS-10s which are mytwo main contendors.Care to take a stab at it for me? I am thinking maybe around 15%?Regards,Ken
I am very curious to hear your estimated percentagedifference between HT2-TLs and the SS-10s which are mytwo main contendors.
I will get my SS10’s in a few weeks and then I can make a comparison that I will have some confidence in.Bob
Jw87c, I see from part II that you are consindering the ST-RT. I have heard the HT3, HT1, SS10 and domed SongTowers. I haven't heard the HT2-TL or the HT1-TL, but it is my impression that the ST-RT is about 10% better than the domed version of the SongTowers and the HT1-TL is 60 percent better than the ST-RT. I also think that the HT2-TL is 15% better than the HT1-TL.
I am very curious to hear your estimated percentagedifference between HT2-TLs and the SS-10s which are mytwo main contenders.Care to take a stab at it for me? I am thinking maybe around 15%?Regards,Ken
Seems like you also think the Veracity line and the STs are in two different leagues.
I thought there was a bigger difference between the HT2-TL and SS10 than the HT2-TL and the SongTower. Granted, I didn't do any extended listening to the SS10 (out of my price range ), so it could have mainly been the open sound of the SS10 that made it stand out more. Whatever it was, it didn't take much listening at all to figure I really liked the SS10! If I could choose between the HT2-TL and the SS10, I take the SS10 in a hearbeat!
If I could choose between the HT2-TL and the SS10, I take the SS10 in a hearbeat!
I guess I should refrain myself from listening to the SS10 . Otherwise even if I bought the HT2-TL, I'm afraid I won't be able to sleep well in the night. The SS10s are way out of my price range.
The HT-2 definitely has superior bass, but IMO the ST dome has better soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging.
Interesting. I was just going to post that I hadn't picked up on soundstaging specificity differences between the various models, but I'm not very sensitive to that. I can't think of any particular reason why the Veracities should image better than the ST--the crossovers are very similar in terms of crossover frequency and phase integration. The HT1 will image differently because it's a TM, not an MTM, but that wouldn't explain the differences between the HT2 and ST. If anything, you would expect the ST to do better because of its smaller drivers and wider dispersion. I'm not claiming there isn't a difference, or that the HT2's aren't better--only that I can't provide any scientific basis for why that should be true. Maybe imaging is also affected by absolute distortion levels, and the Veracity woofers are better in that respect?
I guess hearing what I want to hear might have something to do with it. I do remember during the Jennifer Warner piece, when listening to the HT1, I can clearly tell the location of a sand hammer: horizontally it is about a foot to the left of the left speaker, vertically it is about in the middle between my listening position and the speakers. While switching to the ST, the position of the sand hammer moves right next to the left speaker. The position of the sand hammer from HT2 is kind of between HT1 and ST. Also I noticed that the Veracity speakers sound "fuller" in space, e.g. the sound fill the space better than the STs. It sounds to me like the wide sound stage of the STs is more or less constrained by the position of the two speakers, yet that of the Veracity speakers is a bit wider. Of course these also could be my wishful imaginations