FWIW....having worked for NPR and having known many prominent NPR producers and personalities,i can guarantee you that there is no "government" footprint on any of the arts and music programming.The success of NPR shows are determined by the affiliate who picks up the satellite feed of the program,and inevitably will have to determine the "viability" of the program when they fund raise around it,that will determine the fate and eventually the taste of the audience-will they support it.We ALL pay for advertising every time we buy a product,it is filtered into the price of the product and is reflected in what inevitably you pay for it.I know it sounds extreme to some,but why can't we have a medium that is untouched by commercialism and bows to the whims of advertisers and caters to the taste of the people who will support it? In the last ten years we have seen the ugly specter of the "broadcast endorsement" creep into public broadcasting-soft sell commercials made for this market.Can anyone say that this has elevated the quality of non commercial fm radio? I dare say no,it is a matter of survival,just look at those Lexus ads on "public" tv,they are not fooling anyone and the quality of PBS is at an all time low! NPR,like PBS is desperate for money and the amount of original productions has been reduced drastically,regardless of who pays to endorse it.The money is just not there! I think the tone of this thread would be better served if people supported the local shows they like,and i want to hear from the people that ponied up at fund drive time! As an old public radio fund raiser i am an expert at driving the bloodmobile right up next to the rock quarry,i venture to say i might be able to rattle some schillings out of these most recalcitrant in our midst!