Hi Dev, totally agree.. 'better' can be a very personal word, especially in audio. Just wanted to throw the name out there as a viable option for the poster. I auditioned the Line 2 with a BP26, which was the pre I wanted originally. Was the SF 'better' than the 26? In some regards, yes, others, no, The 26 sounded great, very clean, awesome detail, and I would've been quite happy with it too, but something drew me to the sound of the tube pre so thats the direction I went.. no regrets(obviously i'm not alone here). Besides the sound, I also liked the aesthetics, functionality, and history of the SF stuff. Kind of like a classic muscle car. The Line 3 is built very solid, and has a killer power supply, great remote, theatre bypass etc. Also, the Line 3 is debatably one of the more neutral sounding tube pre's., which is what I liked about the BP26, so I thought I might achieve some of those Bryston attributes in a tube preamp. I admire your system, i'm sure it sounds great, the Ref 3 is undeniably a choice piece. I hope to hear one sometime...Drummer..when are we going to the city again?