« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

RM 30 Progress Report

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 9252 times.

Brian Cheney

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2080
    • http://www.vmpsaudio.com
RM30
« Reply #40 on: 4 Jan 2004, 04:33 am »
The Trinaural Processor has its own sub out (80Hz at 12dB/oct) with a level control.  It is an extraordinarily good sounding electronic crossover but set at too high a frequency for the 215/RM30.  So we have added a passive 6dB hinge point at 56Hz internally to the sub for a perfect blend with the RM30 all three of which will operate full range.
Logged

guest1121

  • Guest
RM 30 Progress Report
« Reply #41 on: 25 Jan 2004, 06:43 am »
I might have missed this spec in one of the other RM-30 threads, but how much will they weigh?  Just curious...
Logged

John Casler

RM 30 Progress Report
« Reply #42 on: 25 Jan 2004, 07:20 pm »
Quote from: Scott-C
I might have missed this spec in one of the other RM-30 threads, but how much will they weigh?  Just curious...


The RM30M weighs 110# and is 4 ohms
Logged

guest1121

  • Guest
RM 30 Progress Report
« Reply #43 on: 26 Jan 2004, 01:00 am »
Thanks John!
Logged

klh

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 925
RM 30 Progress Report
« Reply #44 on: 14 Feb 2004, 06:30 pm »
Anyone at VMPS,

Have you guys thought of developing a horizontal center channel speaker to match the RM-30s that has one central standard HE/FS tweeter, two vertical Neo mids on both sides (four total), and two active 6.5s (one on each end). So it is...

       [(6.5)(Neo)(Neo)(tweeter)(Neo)(Neo)(6.5)]

Wouldn't make sense for the center channel to be symmetrical? And, since the center channel has the dialogue, wouldn't it make sense for there to be 4 Neos? If time alignment with four Neos is too difficult, what about if there is just one Neo on each side of the tweeter?

Just a thought... I bet it would sell well.

KLH
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »