0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 546089 times.
Better than Suzuki even? That's my benchmark right now for sound and performance.
I've collected Herreweghe, Suzuki, Pierlot and Eric Milnes' Montreal Baroque and am familiar with Gardiner and Kuijken but not Koopman so much. I think Lutz's team scores over all of them primarily in two areas: The first is the projection of the shear joy of music making. These singers and instrumentalists seem to sound like they're having a blast. The singers in particular (and they're all top notch) really put emotion into their parts projecting the meaning of the words superbly.The second is the immediacy and transparency of the recorded sound. These are live events and the recording puts the listener in ideal perspective with amazing clarity and sound-stage depth and width. But you get none of the drawbacks of live recording eg. audience noise, flubs, etc. (not sure how they accomplished that!).If you have any way of sampling these performances in hi-rez I encourage you to try them. Sorry about your wallet...
Like many, my collection has several Respighi Pines of Rome. I was mounting a Sumiko Blackbird and was playing the much sought after Reiner Pines on RCA. Then for grins I put on a 1960 Malcolm Sargent version on Everest 3051 that I can't remember the last time it got played. It compared quite positively... a very clean pressing with excellent sonics. And the Blackbird does different things well compared to my Dynavector 20x2.
Hmmm... I don't believe , I would have developed much of an interest at all in Reiner/CSO recordings had it been on a Dynavector pressing as a tremendous amount of the "Living Stereo" sound engineering of Mohr/Layton became much less perceptable once RCA decided to use this process.The "Living" part of "Living Stereo" became a shadow of their very Dynamically contrasted original recordings as the Dynavector pressings graphically equalized/lessened the contrasts (The recordings were ahead of their time & as such not completely compatible with the average listener's playback equipment; So RCA decided to "fix" what wasn't actually "broken") The Everest recordings (as were the Decca & EMI recordings) of this Era were also quite respectable.