0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 546218 times.
I also own everything. No streaming. I have upwards of 7,000 CD's on my office shelves.
(This emerging complete Bach cantata cycle from the J.S. Bach-Stiftung St. Gallen in Switzerland is, IMO, the best performed and best sounding of any on the market)--
(This emerging complete Bach cantata cycle from the J.S. Bach-Stiftung St. Gallen in Switzerland is, IMO, the best performed and best sounding of any on the market)--J. S. Bach: «Nur jedem das Seine» BWV 163
Ugh, can I afford to buy yet another set? Who am a I, Mr. Moneybags? Is this truly worth the temptation? I have about 3/4 Koopman and 1/4 Gardiner. Lutz is better? Time to break out the Alfred Durr. Winter promises to be long. Thanks (I think).
I've collected Herreweghe, Suzuki, Pierlot and Eric Milnes' Montreal Baroque and am familiar with Gardiner and Kuijken but not Koopman so much. I think Lutz's team scores over all of them primarily in two areas: The first is the projection of the shear joy of music making. These singers and instrumentalists seem to sound like they're having a blast. The singers in particular (and they're all top notch) really put emotion into their parts projecting the meaning of the words superbly.The second is the immediacy and transparency of the recorded sound. These are live events and the recording puts the listener in ideal perspective with amazing clarity and sound-stage depth and width. But you get none of the drawbacks of live recording eg. audience noise, flubs, etc. (not sure how they accomplished that!).If you have any way of sampling these performances in hi-rez I encourage you to try them. Sorry about your wallet...