Well I can see the reasoning here though I think we all draw different conclusions. Any money spent upgrading an existing piece of equipment (diminishing returns) is, of course, potential revenue towards another perhaps more economic purchase (increasing returns). I think some of us swap components in and out like others rent movies, and some of us get something out of building kits to the best of our limited abilities, fearful of the old adage "there's never enough time to build it right, but always time to fix it."
In my case, I'm building a Ripper, and all the resistors but the ones in the power supply will be Texas Components 2352s. I'm doing this not because I want to have the most expensive Ripper ever made, but because no matter what phono-pre I fall in love with, I want to be able to digitize vinyl too. So one way or another, the whole or some portion of the Ripper's circuit is going to live on, and I want to think I had enough foresight to "overbuild" it the first time around. After all, I may end up married to it for a decade!
And if these resistors turn out to be a crock of b.s., well, I guess I can say I've been there, done that, and it isn't worth the money (should have spent the money on a better cartridge!). First-hand experience provides many solutions to obstacles not yet encountered, and not many economic models know how to account for that.
-Brinkman