Best Capacitor in the World! You Will Be Surprised!!! Capacitors

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 116423 times.

SMc Audio

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 19
Thanks John!  I have revised my signature per your guidelines.

Steve McCormack
designer, SMc Audio, McCormack Audio
www.SMcAudio.com

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
I am concerned that there may be some confusion over the term "bypass" as used in this thread.  I use the term (in this context) to refer to multiple capacitors wired in parallel in the same physical location, or nearly so.  The purpose of this (at least within the realm of high-end audio) is to create a single, conjugate capacitor that outperforms ("sounds better than") any single cap in the same application.  The mix of caps is usually arrived at through a series of listening evaluations, so the process is mainly subjective.

On the other hand, stable circuit design often demands the use of "decoupling" caps located as close as possible to the circuit elements they are helping to stabilize.  These caps are often referred to as "local bypass" caps, and they are electrically in parallel with the main power supply caps.  While these may be considered "bypass" caps, they do not really fall into the category being discussed in this thread.  Of course, these local bypass caps may themselves be bypassed, but I digress....   :wink:

I design fairly wideband preamps and amps, and they are stable without the need for zobel loading networks.  I could remove all of the bypass caps in any of my designs and they would continue to operate perfectly.  I would not, however, consider removing the local decoupling caps.

Steve McCormack
designer, SMc Audio, McCormack Audio
www.SMcAudio.com

Always nice to see you pop over here Steve.

Glad to see that you are also now offering upgrades to the DNA-500.

Sorry to post off topic...

George

Imperial

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1470
  • Love keeps us in the air, when we ought to fall.
But how about the "node" couplers S. McCormack?
Do you use this type of "bypass" on these?

Imperial

NagysAudio

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 466
    • http://www.nagysaudio.com
Hi Guys!

To Pat:

Please read previous posts before you reply. I have clearly stated that bypass capacitors need to be placed as close to the circuitry as possible. I even gave an example: "For example, if it's a mosfet output stage amplifier, the bypass caps need to be located as close to the mosfets as possible." I NEVER said that the bypass cap was located at the main electrolytic capacitor. Please do not falsely accuse me of making such statements. Trust me Pat, I know physics.

To Mr. McCormack:

I have listened to your amplifiers and preamps and they are FANTASTIC!

Rough specs of some of the amps I worked on are +/- 1dB 0-500kHz, I cannot get away without a zobel.

I think that a lot of the readers here do not understand what bypass capacitors (or decoupling - local bypass as you have called them) do. Truth is, is that they're all over the circuit board. Without them, solid state amplifiers would NOT operate properly. They would generate, oscillate, transistors could overheat and fail, etc. I have never ever seen any design without them!

To Readers:

The capacitor is a bypass capacitor regardless if it's sitting somewhere on the circuit board miles away from the power electrolytic or if it's directly soldered to the electrolytic cap's leads. If you don't understand that, there are many great Electronics 101 books on www.amazon.com :)

Now this all started because I was answering a question for Mr. Bronk, so let me elaborate a little further. I believe that you were talking about a tube amp? Your power supply capacitors are 4700uF, so realistically speaking you have to use electrolytic capacitors. In the schematic, are there any smaller value capacitors connected in parallel to the larger caps? If yes, than pretty much all you can do is plug and listen to different caps to see which ones you like best. My personal favorite are the Vishay BC Components for large values and Vishay MKT 1822 for smaller values.

If there are no smaller value capacitors connected in parallel, than you can try adding some yourself. Remember, electrolytic capacitors do not operate well with high frequencies, so adding smaller value film capacitors will make the now new capacitor as a whole much better. And it doesn't matter if they are Black Gates, or Elna's, or Jensens, etc. Bypassing electrolytic capacitors with smaller film caps will ALWAYS make the power supply better electrically speaking. Weather you will hear a difference in your tube amp or not is an objective opinion.

Thanks!
Norbert

Imperial

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1470
  • Love keeps us in the air, when we ought to fall.
It's a bit of a quibble heated string this, and one has to understand that designers, as some that have posted already has faced this kind of talk and stuff regarding design decisions for some years now, no wonder they reply and post as they do. The bleeding' youngsters that always has to speak (I'm not excluding myself from this club...)... and tell the older dudes how it's done...
It gets old you know.

On the technical side... A lot of ways exist, some lead to Rome... some not.
I believe that one has to just like the fact that so much resolve (lets call it that..) is posting in this thread these days. I like it! And these kind of talks should of course be mutual beneficial for everyone... even the readers (We would hope...)

What I believe is also important, and as Bill (Response Audio) clearly remarks, people need to not jump to all sort of conclusions and overreact when they read a post and then post themselves...
This ain't no competition on who's best! Or right for that matter, it's a tech-Jam session...
Keep it real... or "bypass" it all together, that ain't half bad either...  :thumb:

It's a capacitor Jam-Session... make music dudes...

Imperial
« Last Edit: 14 Jul 2007, 09:39 pm by Imperial »

SMc Audio

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 19
Hello Norbert,

Thanks for your kind words - it's nice to hear that you have enjoyed my work.  You are correct, of course, in your definition of bypass caps.  It has been my experience, though, that most audiophiles use the term to refer to wiring multiple caps together in a parallel group to form a single, higher-performance cap.  I just wanted to clarify this point to (hopefully) avoid any confusion on the topic.  I wish you the best in your work.

To Imperial:  I'm sorry, but I don't understand your question about "nodes."  Were you asking about my "DNA" technique for distributing the larger electrolytic capacitors in a solid-state output stage?  Or something else?  I do use bypass caps in my designs in the sense that I use multiple types of caps grouped together for improved performance.  Exactly which caps I use and how they are employed varies depending on the product, but beyond that information, sorry - I'm not giving away the farm  :wink:  Happily, most of my designs are direct-coupled, so I rarely have to concern myself with the quality of a coupling cap.

Best regards,

Steve McCormack
designer, SMc Audio, McCormack Audio
www.SMcAudio.com

Imperial

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1470
  • Love keeps us in the air, when we ought to fall.
To Imperial:  I'm sorry, but I don't understand your question about "nodes."  Were you asking about my "DNA" technique for distributing the larger electrolytic capacitors in a solid-state output stage?  Or something else?  I do use bypass caps in my designs in the sense that I use multiple types of caps grouped together for improved performance.  Exactly which caps I use and how they are employed varies depending on the product, but beyond that information, sorry - I'm not giving away the farm  :wink:  Happily, most of my designs are direct-coupled, so I rarely have to concern myself with the quality of a coupling cap.

Best regards,

Steve McCormack
designer, SMc Audio, McCormack Audio
www.SMcAudio.com
It was the DNA part that I asked about.
About the farm: Keep the cows happy Steve M, that's all that's important.


Imperial

guest1632

  • Guest
Hi Guys!

To Pat:

Please read previous posts before you reply. I have clearly stated that bypass capacitors need to be placed as close to the circuitry as possible. I even gave an example: "For example, if it's a mosfet output stage amplifier, the bypass caps need to be located as close to the mosfets as possible." I NEVER said that the bypass cap was located at the main electrolytic capacitor. Please do not falsely accuse me of making such statements. Trust me Pat, I know physics.

To Mr. McCormack:

I have listened to your amplifiers and preamps and they are FANTASTIC!

Rough specs of some of the amps I worked on are +/- 1dB 0-500kHz, I cannot get away without a zobel.

I think that a lot of the readers here do not understand what bypass capacitors (or decoupling - local bypass as you have called them) do. Truth is, is that they're all over the circuit board. Without them, solid state amplifiers would NOT operate properly. They would generate, oscillate, transistors could overheat and fail, etc. I have never ever seen any design without them!

To Readers:

The capacitor is a bypass capacitor regardless if it's sitting somewhere on the circuit board miles away from the power electrolytic or if it's directly soldered to the electrolytic cap's leads. If you don't understand that, there are many great Electronics 101 books on www.amazon.com :)

Now this all started because I was answering a question for Mr. Bronk, so let me elaborate a little further. I believe that you were talking about a tube amp? Your power supply capacitors are 4700uF, so realistically speaking you have to use electrolytic capacitors. In the schematic, are there any smaller value capacitors connected in parallel to the larger caps? If yes, than pretty much all you can do is plug and listen to different caps to see which ones you like best. My personal favorite are the Vishay BC Components for large values and Vishay MKT 1822 for smaller values.

If there are no smaller value capacitors connected in parallel, than you can try adding some yourself. Remember, electrolytic capacitors do not operate well with high frequencies, so adding smaller value film capacitors will make the now new capacitor as a whole much better. And it doesn't matter if they are Black Gates, or Elna's, or Jensens, etc. Bypassing electrolytic capacitors with smaller film caps will ALWAYS make the power supply better electrically speaking. Weather you will hear a difference in your tube amp or not is an objective opinion.

Thanks!
Norbert

Hi Norbert,

The amp I am referring to is a SS MOSFET unit.

Guys, correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding for the use of a bypass cap with reference to an electrolytic is to deal with the charge leakage. Now, I don't profess to know all the ends and outs of this stuff, but bypassing in a power supply the electrolytics would help those caps to do their jobs better. That's why I mentioned the "TCaps" like the Jensen 4 pole caps.

Regards,
Ray

OTL

Hi Steve!

I'm a VERY happy SMC Audio (ALD w/phono) customer and I chuckled deeply reading your "not giving away the farm" comment regarding your bypass capacitor design considerations.  C'mon man.....I've got a soldering iron.  Let me know what you know!   :lol: :lol:

That said, just curious to know if you're thinking about, or are able to reenter the market with high performance, high value amplification gear?

Your ears, design talent, resulting musiclity and reliability really really need an outlet in the present market.

Other than that, I'll continue to buy used!

Listen, share and enjoy!


TheChairGuy

U are welcome, and thank you for complying so readily/quickly  :thumb:

John Curl, Pat/art, when you check back in on this topic, please comply, as well.

John / TCG / Moderator

Thanks John!  I have revised my signature per your guidelines.

Steve McCormack
designer, SMc Audio, McCormack Audio
www.SMcAudio.com

NagysAudio

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 466
    • http://www.nagysaudio.com
Hi Ray,

Well, if it's a solid state amp then your power supply capacitors are already bypassed multiple times. I would not recommend adding more or changing the values (or locations) of the already present smaller value capacitors. If you change the values of the smaller capacitors, the amp could become unstable, unless you know what you're doing.

But, you can replace them with different same value capacitors and see if you like the sound better. However, if the part quality is already decent, the differences you will hear will be minimal. The design of the power supply usually dictates on how well the amp performs/sounds. The Jensen capacitors are wonderful caps, but they are expensive. If you can afford them, use them. Most large manufacturers use less expensive caps, Bryston for example use Chemi-Con capacitors in their power supplies.

For my designs, in stereo configuration I use 4 toroidal transformers. 2 for the positive rails in each of the channels and 2 for negative. In most mosfet amps, the voltages are +/- 80V. So two transformers per channel, a mil spec'd bridge rectifier, 2 - 4700uF electrolytic caps (like Chemi-Con's), 2 - 47uF electrolytic caps (Vishay BC Componenets) mounted on the circuit board, 2 - 1uF film caps (Vishay MKT1822) mounted on the circuit board and one 10nF film cap per mosfet. These should be located right by the mosfet devices. I usually use 4 mosfets per channel, so 4 caps per channel total (also Vishay BC Components). Thats it! That's my power supply for the output stage.

For input stages, the power supply becomes MUCH more complicated. Basically I take the voltage before the bridge rectifier, which will be lower, maybe 60VAC, from the same toroidal transformers. Then painstakingly design a filter which has very little noise. I use diodes, transistors, and multiple capacitors to achieve the desired result. 

Bye!

SMc Audio

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 19
Ray wrote:
>Guys, correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding for the use of a bypass cap with reference to an electrolytic is to deal with the charge leakage...<

Hi Ray -  The design and construction of electrolytic capacitors gives them a big advantage in storage density (capacitance per unit volume) but at the expense of high-frequency performance.  The impedance of electrolytics goes up considerably at high-frequencies, so bypassing them with smaller caps that have excellent high-frequency performance is intended to offset this behavior.  When everything works properly, you create a capacitance that has both high energy density and excellent high-frequency performance (very low impedance and distortion).  For the purposes of high-end audio, bypass caps are almost exclusively film types (polyester, polypropylene, polystyrene, teflon, etc.)  Generally speaking, electrolytic caps are only useful because of their high energy density - otherwise we would much rather use nothing but film caps.  Still, it's hard to get along without them, and there are a few that are pretty good for audio.  NagysAudio has found some that he likes, and I use both high-end Nichicons and Black Gates as my preferred electrolytics.

OTL - Thanks for your comments - I'm pleased to hear your ALD-1 is serving you well.  As you may know, SMc Audio is my full-time gig now, and I have been working on some new component designs for a few years.  The first offering from SMc is my "statement" preamp - the VRE-1.  You can see preliminary info on my website.  I have designs for new amplifiers and other versions of the preamp (multichannel, for instance) that will be coming along as soon as I can make them happen, but that is a somewhat slower process these days, I'm sorry to say.  I was happy to trade-off the administrative complexity of a larger company for the freedom and simplicity of a smaller (much) one, but it does mean that creating new equipment takes a lot longer than it used to.  Anyhow, I'm plugging away, and the preamp will be out pretty soon.  Thanks for asking.

Best regards,

Steve McCormack
designer, SMc Audio, McCormack Audio
www.SMcAudio.com

denjo

Hi Steve
Welcome to AudioCircle! I hope to see more of your posts in AudioCircle. I know that fellow members will benefit immensely from your great knowledge and expertise. I am also interested in your new VRE-1. Perhaps we should start a new post about it somewhere in AudioCircle!
My sister is enjoying your modded McCormack DNA-0.5 Rev A so much that she is not parting with it ever!  :D

Best Regards
Dennis

Kevin Haskins

This topic is second only to cables in terms of opportunity for bullshit.   
 

Bill Baker

  • Industry Participant
  • Posts: 4906
  • Musica Bella Audio- Custom Design and Manufacturi
    • Musica Bella Audio
Okay, I figured I would at least post some of my thoughts and maybe clear up a few things regarding questions I have been asked. I will first say that like everyone else here, these are only my personal opinions and are just that.... an opinion. I'm sure this thread will continue with many more opinions. I realize there cannot and will not be an end to such a subjective subject just as there will never be an end to the cables, botique capacitors and solid state vs tube debates.

 I think there are a lot of people who really don't/can't recognize various bypass caps within a circuit. Too many times these will be called something other than what they actually are. You will find reference to them as signal ground caps, shunt capacitors and of course bypass capacitors. One thing I agree with is that a "bypass" capacitor should be placed as close to the next "component" as possible and utilize the shortest possible lead length. In many situations, the main electrolytic filter capacitor is where you most often find them as these are the most accessible. In this case, again, keep the leads as short as physically possible.

Steve wrote:

Quote
For the purposes of high-end audio, bypass caps are almost exclusively film types (polyester, polypropylene, polystyrene, Teflon, etc.)  Generally speaking, electrolytic caps are only useful because of their high energy density - otherwise we would much rather use nothing but film caps.

 I agree 100%. Unfortunately, film capacitors are not available in the large values required for most power supplies. Especially in tube amp applications. If they were, they would be the size of coffee cans There are a few good "non-lytic" capacitors finding their way into the industry. The Un-lytic and Mundorfs new M-TubeCap film capacitors. The Un-lytics are very expensive but you are very likely to find the value and voltage rating required for tube amp supplies. They are also 3" in diameter and up a several inches long. The Mundorf is only available up to a 47uF at this time which makes for a good preamp PS cap as well as a good cap to use in tube rectified power supplies. These are also rather large at 2" in dia. (I just got a few in this morning). I can only imagine these will benefit from a good bypass such as a Teflon. Time will tell.

 I cannot argue about solid state design as I have been working with tubes, and tubes exclusively, for over 10 years (both tube and solid state power supplies) but I am a believer in bypassing power supply filter caps and agree there are procedures that provide better results than others. Simply throwing in as many "bypass caps" that you can physically fit within an enclosure does not normally provide optimal results.

 Lastely, I will say that bypassing should not be used as a band-aid for a poor circuit design. You will still have a bad design and now less money in your wallet.

TV Man

My 2 cents.

I ordered a pair of the Vishay caps that were mentioned at the start of this thread at a value of 4.7uf. They were inexpensive... $4 each or something like that, and I needed to order some parts for other projects so they got put on the list.

I replaced an old pair of 4.7uf Sidereal (older Auricap model) DC blocking caps at the output of my DAC with them when they arrived. My first impression was wow, these are pretty good.

They have maybe 20 hours on them now and are clearer with a nice liquidity than the caps they replaced. I don't know what the best cap is, but the Vishay's mentioned are better than the old Sidereal caps I had. I'm Listening to more music lately, some nagging of the problems with a grey opaqueness to the sound in my system are solved due to this cap swap. They sound rich but clear without adding harshness... Thanks for the tip on these, they're definitely worth a try considering the price.

guest1632

  • Guest

I've been into audio for 11 plus years and I have heard dozens of capacitors. Everything from military specd, to audiophile grade. Ranging in price from just a few pennies to hundreds of dollars.

And the best capacitors that I have ever heard are Vishay. These are made in Germany by Vishay Roederstein to be exact, model number MKT 1822. They were previously know as the ERO capacitors. The MKT1822 is a box style timing capacitor, made out of metalized polyester. They range from 1000pF - 15.0uF and have voltages from 63vdc - 250vdc.

Most audiophiles will disagree because it goes against all audiophile grade logic. They don't have Teflon, copper foil, silver foil, polypropylene/foil design, silver leads, oil, etc. But what they have is what counts, absolutely stunning sound.

It is virtually vale free and grain free. I have never heard any other capacitor come close! They have incredible resolution and sparkle to the high frequency. The term "liquid" should have been invented for these caps. Plus they have to most un-electric midrange I have ever heard. The best part is that they are dirt cheap, a few bucks max for the larger values. And they work as well in speaker crossovers as they do as coupling or bypass capacitors in amplifiers, preamps, dacs, etc. Here's a list of some capacitors which I compared the MKT 1822's to.

AuriCap
Hovland
SCR Solen
Jensen
RelCap Audio Cap Theta
MultiCap RTX
MultiCap PPMFX
Russian Military Teflon High Voltage Types

Hi Norbert,

Ok, where do I buy these caps?

Ray

F-100


NagysAudio

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 466
    • http://www.nagysaudio.com
TV Man, I'm glad you liked them!

www.mouser.com

Seems like one of the few reliable places to get these capacitors at. I have also seen them for sale at

www.newark.com

and their sister sites.

Norbert

dave_c

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 380
I just received mine which will be used as input coupling caps on my Trends TA10.1 (replacing Bennic XPP's I think).  Does anyone know if they have an orientation to follow?  Both leads appear to be the same length, only way to differentiate is with the printed side and that to me is a crapshoot.  Also going to use one as a DC Bias cap as well.  I'll post after the change.  But please if anyone has an idea about which direction they should face that would be helpful.

Thanks!