0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 158935 times.
We performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rollo
Quote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:36 amQuote from: rollo on 11 Apr 2007, 12:19 amWe performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rolloYes I look forward to reading more on Nick's Dac. I'll say it one more time. This USB+Paradisea is another ball game guys. I would gladly run it up against the Lector. It will be more of a contest I can assure you. Regardless of the Cd players cost. The key is the PC being used as a transport and no basic digital cable in between the two. This makes a HUGE difference in the quality of sound coming from these non os dacs. Until you hear the difference ..you'll not understand. IMO, these statements are T-Ball set-ups. The Paradisea is limited by parts quality and design. No doubt the USB+ version sounds excellent. Heck, I owned an original Paradisea and I was very pleased with the performance, so I have some experience. However, my Paradisea was eclipsed by the performance of a better and more refined digital source in the $2500 range.There are no Giant Killers in this hobby. Never have been. The constant search for one is like waiting for Godot.Why not accept the excellence of certain products for what they are? That's a perfectly valid and enjoyable endeavor.
Quote from: rollo on 11 Apr 2007, 12:19 amWe performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rolloYes I look forward to reading more on Nick's Dac. I'll say it one more time. This USB+Paradisea is another ball game guys. I would gladly run it up against the Lector. It will be more of a contest I can assure you. Regardless of the Cd players cost. The key is the PC being used as a transport and no basic digital cable in between the two. This makes a HUGE difference in the quality of sound coming from these non os dacs. Until you hear the difference ..you'll not understand.
Quote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:46 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 01:38 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:36 amQuote from: rollo on 11 Apr 2007, 12:19 amWe performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rolloYes I look forward to reading more on Nick's Dac. I'll say it one more time. This USB+Paradisea is another ball game guys. I would gladly run it up against the Lector. It will be more of a contest I can assure you. Regardless of the Cd players cost. The key is the PC being used as a transport and no basic digital cable in between the two. This makes a HUGE difference in the quality of sound coming from these non os dacs. Until you hear the difference ..you'll not understand. IMO, these statements are T-Ball set-ups. The Paradisea is limited by parts quality and design. No doubt the USB+ version sounds excellent. Heck, I owned an original Paradisea and I was very pleased with the performance, so I have some experience. However, my Paradisea was eclipsed by the performance of a better and more refined digital source in the $2500 range.There are no Giant Killers in this hobby. Never have been. The constant search for one is like waiting for Godot.Why not accept the excellence of certain products for what they are? That's a perfectly valid and enjoyable endeavor. Tvad I have only one question. Have you tried it yet? Because if you haven't the point is moot my friend. Most of you who use CD players as front ends completely over look PC audio any way. Give it a go and then come back and tell me what you think.You used the Paradisea with an ancient Cd player as a transport. How good did you expect it to be? I also used the Paradisea with a late model modified universal player (the modified Modwright Sony 999ES), so the point is not moot amigo.Let's not piss about the schoolyard. If you want SOTA playback with a computer source, then invest in a SOTA DAC. The USB+ Paradisea is not a SOTA DAC by any measure.
Quote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 01:38 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:36 amQuote from: rollo on 11 Apr 2007, 12:19 amWe performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rolloYes I look forward to reading more on Nick's Dac. I'll say it one more time. This USB+Paradisea is another ball game guys. I would gladly run it up against the Lector. It will be more of a contest I can assure you. Regardless of the Cd players cost. The key is the PC being used as a transport and no basic digital cable in between the two. This makes a HUGE difference in the quality of sound coming from these non os dacs. Until you hear the difference ..you'll not understand. IMO, these statements are T-Ball set-ups. The Paradisea is limited by parts quality and design. No doubt the USB+ version sounds excellent. Heck, I owned an original Paradisea and I was very pleased with the performance, so I have some experience. However, my Paradisea was eclipsed by the performance of a better and more refined digital source in the $2500 range.There are no Giant Killers in this hobby. Never have been. The constant search for one is like waiting for Godot.Why not accept the excellence of certain products for what they are? That's a perfectly valid and enjoyable endeavor. Tvad I have only one question. Have you tried it yet? Because if you haven't the point is moot my friend. Most of you who use CD players as front ends completely over look PC audio any way. Give it a go and then come back and tell me what you think.You used the Paradisea with an ancient Cd player as a transport. How good did you expect it to be?
Quote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 02:03 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 01:59 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:46 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 01:38 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:36 amQuote from: rollo on 11 Apr 2007, 12:19 amWe performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rolloYes I look forward to reading more on Nick's Dac. I'll say it one more time. This USB+Paradisea is another ball game guys. I would gladly run it up against the Lector. It will be more of a contest I can assure you. Regardless of the Cd players cost. The key is the PC being used as a transport and no basic digital cable in between the two. This makes a HUGE difference in the quality of sound coming from these non os dacs. Until you hear the difference ..you'll not understand. IMO, these statements are T-Ball set-ups. The Paradisea is limited by parts quality and design. No doubt the USB+ version sounds excellent. Heck, I owned an original Paradisea and I was very pleased with the performance, so I have some experience. However, my Paradisea was eclipsed by the performance of a better and more refined digital source in the $2500 range.There are no Giant Killers in this hobby. Never have been. The constant search for one is like waiting for Godot.Why not accept the excellence of certain products for what they are? That's a perfectly valid and enjoyable endeavor. Tvad I have only one question. Have you tried it yet? Because if you haven't the point is moot my friend. Most of you who use CD players as front ends completely over look PC audio any way. Give it a go and then come back and tell me what you think.You used the Paradisea with an ancient Cd player as a transport. How good did you expect it to be? I also used the Paradisea with a late model modified universal player (the modified Modwright Sony 999ES), so the point is not moot amigo.Let's not piss about the schoolyard. If you want SOTA playback with a computer source, then invest in a SOTA DAC. The USB+ Paradisea is not a SOTA DAC by any measure.Amigo a modified Sony isn't a PC transport by any measure. You never answered my question. Have you heard it using something better than a basic CD player with a digital cable?If not I rest my case MOOT POINT! In order to understand PC audio..YOU HAVE TO TRY IT. It isn't the same as running your basic transports.. in sound or anything else.Read my comment regrading PC audio in my previous post. Until you have heard true SOTA digital playback via silver disc playback, then you also have no idea, and the point is not moot.The fact remains that the USB+ Paradisea is not a SOTA DAC. The transport issue is ancillary to the debate. If you want to truly hear what computer audio is capable of, then make an effort to hear a better DAC. Until then, you are limiting even the capability of computer audio.
Quote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 01:59 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:46 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 01:38 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 01:36 amQuote from: rollo on 11 Apr 2007, 12:19 amWe performed a comparison of a modded and unmodded Paradisea dac at the March Rave to my LectorCDP7t. The Lector smoked both no contest. No, these are not my comments, but the comments of the attendees. The Promitheus DAC is going to be a unique design with a transformer coupled output I believe. This should prove very interesting. rolloYes I look forward to reading more on Nick's Dac. I'll say it one more time. This USB+Paradisea is another ball game guys. I would gladly run it up against the Lector. It will be more of a contest I can assure you. Regardless of the Cd players cost. The key is the PC being used as a transport and no basic digital cable in between the two. This makes a HUGE difference in the quality of sound coming from these non os dacs. Until you hear the difference ..you'll not understand. IMO, these statements are T-Ball set-ups. The Paradisea is limited by parts quality and design. No doubt the USB+ version sounds excellent. Heck, I owned an original Paradisea and I was very pleased with the performance, so I have some experience. However, my Paradisea was eclipsed by the performance of a better and more refined digital source in the $2500 range.There are no Giant Killers in this hobby. Never have been. The constant search for one is like waiting for Godot.Why not accept the excellence of certain products for what they are? That's a perfectly valid and enjoyable endeavor. Tvad I have only one question. Have you tried it yet? Because if you haven't the point is moot my friend. Most of you who use CD players as front ends completely over look PC audio any way. Give it a go and then come back and tell me what you think.You used the Paradisea with an ancient Cd player as a transport. How good did you expect it to be? I also used the Paradisea with a late model modified universal player (the modified Modwright Sony 999ES), so the point is not moot amigo.Let's not piss about the schoolyard. If you want SOTA playback with a computer source, then invest in a SOTA DAC. The USB+ Paradisea is not a SOTA DAC by any measure.Amigo a modified Sony isn't a PC transport by any measure. You never answered my question. Have you heard it using something better than a basic CD player with a digital cable?If not I rest my case MOOT POINT! In order to understand PC audio..YOU HAVE TO TRY IT. It isn't the same as running your basic transports.. in sound or anything else.
QuoteThose same designers of so called SOTA digital also have much to lose. if I were them I would say the same thing. Thus far, APL cannot keep up with demand. The designer is not concerned.
Those same designers of so called SOTA digital also have much to lose. if I were them I would say the same thing.
Quote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 02:23 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:20 amQuoteThose same designers of so called SOTA digital also have much to lose. if I were them I would say the same thing. Thus far, APL cannot keep up with demand. The designer is not concerned. Just give it time..it's right around the corner. I choose to live in the moment...not design my audio system for what will be. There is NOTHING more certain than what is up-to-date today in computer audio will be out of date in six months. According to your ten year theory, I have at least 20 product cycles to endure.Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Great DAC. No David.
Quote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:20 amQuoteThose same designers of so called SOTA digital also have much to lose. if I were them I would say the same thing. Thus far, APL cannot keep up with demand. The designer is not concerned. Just give it time..it's right around the corner.
Quote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 02:35 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:25 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 02:23 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:20 amQuoteThose same designers of so called SOTA digital also have much to lose. if I were them I would say the same thing. Thus far, APL cannot keep up with demand. The designer is not concerned. Just give it time..it's right around the corner. I choose to live in the moment...not design my audio system for what will be. There is NOTHING more certain than what is up-to-date today in computer audio will be out of date in six months. According to your ten year theory, I have at least 20 product cycles to endure.Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Great DAC. No David.Funny! ....where's Gordon Rankin when you need him? Read up on the PC audio thang here.Unless Alex paycheck's player can hold several thousand songs at a finger tip...no thanks! Well, you're discussing personal convenience and preference now, not quality of playback, which is what I believe the original statement I replied to was about. It had nothing to do with computer audio. For true SOTA DAC decoding of your digital source look to Empirical Audio, and later to APL HiFi.For current SOTA digital playback, look to the APL HiFi NWO 2.5.Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Great DAC. No Giant Killer. Sorry.
Quote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:25 amQuote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 02:23 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:20 amQuoteThose same designers of so called SOTA digital also have much to lose. if I were them I would say the same thing. Thus far, APL cannot keep up with demand. The designer is not concerned. Just give it time..it's right around the corner. I choose to live in the moment...not design my audio system for what will be. There is NOTHING more certain than what is up-to-date today in computer audio will be out of date in six months. According to your ten year theory, I have at least 20 product cycles to endure.Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Great DAC. No David.Funny! ....where's Gordon Rankin when you need him? Read up on the PC audio thang here.Unless Alex paycheck's player can hold several thousand songs at a finger tip...no thanks!
Have you ever heard a fully modded SB in a high end system? The SB is the giant killer. Many on this forum with very high end systems use the SB as their main source except the total vinyl heads. They have sold their cd players.Raj
It always comes down to insults here doesn't it?Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Excellent DAC. No Giant Killer.
Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? It always comes down to insults here doesn't it?Excellent DAC. No Giant Killer. For a SOTA DAC with computer input capability see Empirical Audio. Until then, you have not heard what your computer transports are capable of.
Quote from: GHM on 11 Apr 2007, 02:55 amQuote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:52 amIt always comes down to insults here doesn't it?Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Excellent DAC. No Giant Killer.That wasn't an insult..just a joke. Alex Paycheck's CD player isn't a giant killer either. He builds it for the people that need the ego boost.Now that's just silly coming from you who espouses hearing for oneself. There's no need to lash out because you can't afford the best. Few of us can. That's the entire point of the Paradisea. It's an excellent DAC that allows people to enjoy music. it's just not a Giant Killer.There are no Giant Killers.
Quote from: tvad4 on 11 Apr 2007, 02:52 amIt always comes down to insults here doesn't it?Isn't this thread about the Paradisea DAC? Excellent DAC. No Giant Killer.That wasn't an insult..just a joke. Alex Paycheck's CD player isn't a giant killer either. He builds it for the people that need the ego boost.
.................pc audio is the way of the future, thats all. it will not eliminate redbook or vinyl no matter how good it gets.
GHM, Can you please shed some more detail on how you interface your computer and the Paradisea USB+? What software do you need in order to play your music collection? Thanks
Quote from: F-100 on 11 Apr 2007, 05:11 amGHM, Can you please shed some more detail on how you interface your computer and the Paradisea USB+? What software do you need in order to play your music collection? ThanksAnd a few photo's would be nice.....
Very interesting!! Thanks for the explanation. No SB needed as transport; just a dac with USB ability. I wonder how the SQ compares to analog mods SB? The analog SB, of course, doesn't use a digital cable either but an ethernet cable or wireless. So it may be the quality of the dac that is all important.