0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 545032 times.
How does the TVC know that it's time to stop breaking in? If the TVC is always breaking in, then it's going to reach the post-break-in point and, at some point, start breaking down. I'm only half-kidding here. This seems to make sense to me and it's why I'm a bit skeptical of break-in. Warm up time? How does that make sense with a TVC? The thing is always on! It doesn't have an on-off switch!
i've finally had a chance to hear promitheus in a normal (not-ref) version from nov 2006, 4 RCA inputs and 2 RCA outputs, against another fully DIY TVC, with a single input and dual mono volume selectors (9 steps only).sorry to say but promitheus was clearly beaten, hands down. still i found it amazing device for 340$ only.
anubisgrau, It was bound to happen................................. ......rollo
anubisgrau, It was bound to happen, one negative review out of 124 pages of threads. What components did you use. From the photos it doesn't look like the system was much. Did the TVC have the Ref. 3 trannies? Did you play the unit for 20 minutes to warm it up? How did you conduct the comparison. What is the output voltage of the CDP you used. If it sounded thin and bright either it was the source or the TVC was not fully broken in. I thought the same thing until the TVC had over 350 HRs of play time. I am puzzled by the statement that it sounds this way because it is unshielded but with the cover off it sounded better. I agree it sounds better with the cover off, however doesn't the steel cover aid in shielding. I think most all posters disagree that the unit is thin and bright. It has air and bloom just not as much as a tubed active. What type of internal wiring is in the homemade version? If it is copper I can bet this would make a difference. If not there was a synergy problem somewhere either the CDP or cabling. Who's trannies did you use and how much did it cost to make? rollo