0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 10580 times.
Perhaps if Edgar is reading this he might like to put his side of the story, one must be fair.
Respect? This has nothing to do with respect. Are we supposed to treat publishers with kid gloves? They need to appease their audience. If their business model is to try and survive purely by advertising dollars then they'd better work darn hard to appease the casual and I might add, wholly uninvested readership. I think that the Aspen and Promitheus "reviews" are good examples of how their system fails. That's all.-Mike
The above tale insinuates that we made a commitment and didn't keep our end of the bargain. Not. But I can't blame a reviewer for eventually losing interest if a manufacturer fails to deliver the product he approached us with to get reviewed in the first place. in a timely manner It's interesting though how history can get rewritten so easily...
In this case, Edgar was the one reviewer interested. As I recall it, however, it was he who was left waiting after he'd agreed - because the product was undergoing changes. After those changes had been implemented, he was informed that a unit was available, albeit not in final production form.
The above tale insinuates that we made a commitment and didn't keep our end of the bargain. Not. But I can't blame a reviewer for eventually losing interest if a manufacturer fails to deliver the product he approached us with to get reviewed in the first place. in a timely manner