Almarro uses great design and nice transformers, but for some reason, the designer uses these grey polyester coupling caps in all his amps, including 318B and A205a II.
Change those out with some nice copper foil caps, e.g Jupiter copper foil, and do a rematch 

Ok, I finally got back the amp, it has more problems than I anticipated. Besides upgrading the 0.44uF cap to Audio Note, and the 0.22uF to Arizona Blue Catus, two of the blue caps leaks and got replaced. Then after that, one side has no high frequencies and the technician replaced 6 of the capacitors as well. I end up spend $600 all together for parts and labor! So, here is the rematch.
After the fix and upgrade if the caps, the Almarro is much more musical, no longer dominate by the mid range. Compared to the Triode Lab 2A3, the music has more weight, more mid and low frequency, even more bass. I don’t expect that because the X5 has a power subwoofer. I believe it is due to the extra 10w of power to the 12” mid range driver.
However, my impression to the Triode Lab still holds. It has more detail, more clarity and more transparent. I can hear more “stuff“ going on. So, for certain records, I enjoy it more on the TL. However, there are some songs that sounds a bit harsh or fatigue-ing to be play on the TL.
So, it is hard to say which one is better. They are both good. The Almarro is more relax, while the Triode Lab reveals every single bits of detail. My taste is more leaning towards the Triode Lab. The Almarro is overall good. But the Triode Lab gives me a smile when listening to the right records.