0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 13089 times.
Too many undefined acronyms--what's 'LIO'?
“In any configuration, the LIO is… the most attractive, well-crafted integrated amp I’ve seen.”
“All I can say is, when you replace amps like the Pass XA100.5s with any moderately priced integrated, you’re supposed to feel grave disappointment. That afternoon, I felt shock and wonder. Right out of the box, the Vinnie Rossi LIO played music that flowed smoothly and silkily—and was noticeably more quiet and grainless than the venerable Passes.”
“The LIO was extremely good at getting out of the way and letting this music have its way with me."
“Timbres and textures were always-enjoyable constants, no matter which recording I played. The LIO showed me that grainlessness and high-relief textures are in no way mutually exclusive. Detail, drive, and forward momentum were as good as they get.”
“I have rarely in my life heard a piano sound this real and corporeal in my room.”
“Record after record, I bathed in the almost fragrant beauty of the LIO… as I played all genres of music.”
“The LIO has the Tesla’s [referring to the Telsa Model S electric car] type of quiet power: its massive torque is applied smoothly and equally at all rpms. I experienced unprecedented naturalness of bass.”
“The LIO phono stage was nearly faultless. Its DAC was exceptional, and enjoyably nonmechanical in sound.”
“To my ears, it delivered the best of tubes (color, vividness, liquidity) and the best of solid-state (quietness, control). Its highly adaptable modular design combines a fashionable Italianate aesthetic with near-state-of-the-art sound.”
“If there is a more innovative and musically satisfying integrated amplifier than the Vinnie Rossi LIO, I have yet to experience it.”
I thought comment, where he compared LIO to some very heavy hitters (Komuro PP845, Pass Labs XA100.5), saying "it did come ridiculously close, albeit with a quieter, gentler personality", was very insightful about what the LIO does so well. It is just an enjoyable piece to listen to under a variety of conditions, yet you never feel like you're missing a thing.Congrats on another great review!
Stop it guys! My LIO arrived this morning and is waiting to be unpacked after work today! The next five hours are going to be absolute agony...
You should have got the large photo on the cover. It was a very in depth review on LIO. The review on the Gamut speakers was pretty lukewarm.Don P.
Way to go Vinnie, this must feel pretty darn good to see your product on the cover of a magazine. Obviously you worked hard as a small business owner to make this happen, nice to see that it's working for you.
"I was impressed by the concept underlying the Vinnie Rossi LIO, and its physical execution is stunning. But other than the RVC, moving-magnet Phonostage, and Digital modules, all of which offered good to excellent measured performance, there are problems with the other modules that bothered me. Of course, the benefit of the approach adopted by Vinnie Rossi with the LIO is that he can introduce running improvements to individual modules without requiring the owner replace the entire chassis.—John Atkinson"http://www.stereophile.com/content/vinnie-rossi-lio-modular-integrated-amplifier-measurements#CIT9Qj9b8FXRbLGC.97
The September issue of Stereophile has hit the stands with glowing praise for LIO.
"There were certainly some things from John Aktinson's measurements section that puzzled me"How could it puzzle you that your amp module didn't come close to meeting your published power specs?"The LIO is specified as being able to deliver 25Wpc into 8 ohms (14dBW) or 45Wpc into 4 ohms (13.5dBW). However, with our standard definition of clipping being when the THD+noise reaches 1%, the LIO didn't reach those powers under that condition. It clipped at 17Wpc into 8 ohms (12.3dBW, fig.20) and 30Wpc into 4 ohms (11.75dBW, fig.21). The LIO did meet its specified power into both impedances at 11% THD+N, however. Perhaps more significant is the level of THD+N at lower powers, which is fairly high."
It puzzles me because my testing showed otherwise, which is where I got my figures from (with < 1% distortion). I don't wish debate back and forthover it. I'm not sure what happened there, but we'll see what happens next time.And those who listen to it, especially with more challenging speakers, continue to mention how it performs as if it is more powerful than what the power rating suggests. Go figure!
That's the most lame response I've ever seen.