0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 32392 times.
Way over C&C guidelines.
OP is a newbie. Let's indulge him or her. Pretty clear from thread title that we're over the normal constraints of this thread. But hey, we all live and learn, regardless of if this stays here, or moves to another more appropriate circle, welcome to AV new member! You'll find this is an excellent forum of knowledgeable, generous folks.
LS50s on Audiogon for $1135
The L50's have certainly piqued my interest and I'm just weighing up my options. They might just be out of my range when factoring in shipping (aka Australia tax) and purchasing them locally might cost me a kidney - that is, if I can find them in my city.
Windy:Thanks for the heads up. The BMR driver is most interesting. But seems that the limited number of reviews I could find online for the replacement speaker you reference (Aeromax 2, $700/pair, same size, upgraded bits, gloss black or white) are mixed (reportedly better suited for smaller/quieter material). So not quite sure what to think (do understand they are highly subject to break-in related issues).
Those are great if you like overpriced beamy speakers! Check out the thread on Audio Karma in which Dennis Murphy measured them and was berated because his measurements and the objective observations of listeners (spoiler, people found them beamy with narrow dispersion) confirmed their beamy nature. I would pass...
You are ignorant. Anyone who knows anything about BMR drivers knows they are the antithesis of beamy.
I was also impressed by the midrange performance of the BMR in the Aero I tested, but bothered by the very audible dip in the mid treble and lack of very high end extension.
Dennis Murphy's overall assessment appears to be this...
Jack is just reporting what he read on an Audio Karma thread.
Furthermore, his comments are in reference the the Aero - not the Aeromax with the new 4th generation BMR driver.