0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 49552 times.
The concept of art assumes that it must be a noble, relevant and difficult creation for the common person, being the work of an unusual person, the artist.If everyone is able to do, its not art but something else.
+1 That is probably the worst "definition" of art I've ever read
Yep. And where does one get the idea that DK is "forced" to pose for pix like the one in question?
And..............that is written where?
Unfortunately its not carved in stone(in the minds of people) for this low music is a success.
Out of sheer morbid curiosity, what are some works, be they sculpture, paintings, architecture, or music, that you would consider "art?" And, in contrast, what are some works in those areas that you would not consider "art?"
Would rotten vegetables and dead animals consider art?http://www.designtavern.com/2009/05/the-beauty-of-rotting-fruit-and-a-taxidermied-crow/Some years ago came to my city an installation of rotting fish that occupied an entire room.Of course the smell was brutal.
The concept of art assumes that it must be a noble, relevant and difficult creation for the common person, being the work of an unusual person, the artist.
Art doesn't have to be pleasant. It often isn't.Art: the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.
Frankly, I prefer that to the Earth Room in NYC.