0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 3712 times.
I have two systems. On one I simply play CDs or stream music via MOG. On the other I use Pure Music with Itunes and all music is stored on two separate external HD's. But I would imagine a NAS system would work better. The source, in this case, is a Macbook Pro via a Parasound preamp. I use to use Airfoil as a wireless app/option from computer to my Apple Airport extreme, but it tends to have drop outs in the music.
When you already have Squeezebox Server (LMS) running on your network, it doesn't make much sense to me to pursue a player that requires some other type of streaming server, even if it's using UPnP/DLNA.
Please note that I'm using "server" in the software sense, such that multiple servers can run on the same hardware at once. I already have a NAS running 24/7 to serve all of the data needs in my house. It currently runs Logitech Media Center to serve my existing Squeezebox. It is more than capable of running additional servers as well, should there be need, of which Plex looks to be the most popular and capable. Both would point to the same storage folder full of music on the NAS. (Plex supports DLNA devices, as does the Synology native music server, which is yet a third option that I could point to the existing music folder, should I want it.)
I was also referring to software servers. Why run two servers to support two different types of device? Or deal with two different user interfaces on the devices. I just don't understand that.