Hi Skunark,
The reason I asked was my Audioquest cable was meant for connecting the USB input on the BDA1 to my sound-out in the Macbook. So not for HDD to BDP1.
Not worth it you think? Or a different matter and worth the try?
Marius
The thought with USB Cables for USB DACs is that they can influence the jitter on the older synchronous DACs. There's probably some truth to that with DACs that did a poor job recreating the clock with the Start-of-frame packet. This is also probably the case with the BDA since the DAC is older and only supports at most 48/24 music and uses USB1.1. This shouldn't be a case with asynchronous and adaptive DACs since both reclock the PCM stream.
Unless the DAC came with a USB cable, you probably still need one and $50 USB is high IMO, but not in the unreasonable range.
I would probably buy one for that price if it matches the looks of my other cables (and if I didn't keep my gear behind a door). I used to keep a mini-toslink cable for the occasional need to connect up a laptop, now I just use a thumb-drive on the BDP-1 or BDP-95

.
My experience with USB DACs have been less than positive, so of course you can "pick your poison" on why: computer, dac, cable, software, driver setting, power conditioning, 32 vs 64-bit OS, USB Port, and .... Or just avoid them like I do. If the BDA is your USB DAC, I would say you could do better with the mini-toslink, and you can probably hit at least 96/24 before the Mac OS blocks you (check your midi settings).
BTW: Anonamenmouse's link is a good read and should be an eye-opener for most, but sadly they didn't measure the jitter on the output of the DAC to compare each cable. They also didn't report the system used in the blind test, but since it didn't sound different, someone would question one or more of the items I listed above. Since it sounded the same, what level will the USB DAC make a difference....