0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Read 95977 times.
The DH just full-fills my audiophile void and looks prettier. That's all.
I'm 100% for that.Btw, these are for listening pleasure, not "studio" work, etc, yes?
The Amazon stuff is of poor physical construction then?
Copper clad aluminum has rather poor conductivity compared to pure copper.
I will say yes for that particular offering. Copper clad aluminum has rather poor conductivity compared to pure copper.
What speaker wire did JBL use in the demo? (I'm curious)
JPS Labs has been using copper clad aluminum for years.http://www.jpslabs.com/speakercable.shtml
You still need to compare for yourself, the stands can be returned
It's not about trying it. It's a bit more scientific than that. I'm familiar with them as they will be used under my Funk 21.0LX subs.
Looking good, FYI
Ha, when I was ~20 I worked for a stained glass studio for a couple years. I think the 4367 has the potential to be real close to the M2 but it's not a set system so could vary a lot more. Many benefits of the M2 are not going to be realized outside of a dedicated room, most non-dedicated rooms trash the ruler flat fr and the precise WG is also of less benefit. The M2 is a tool for production of audio first and foremost.
First off, I was in Costa Rica the last two weeks and skimmed the thread to catch up, hopefully I didn't miss too many key points in the discussion. Also, if you haven't been, you owe it to yourself to visit Costa Rica. My favorite destination so far and I am fairly well traveled outside of Asia (which I plan to do this summer-ish).I think a CD waveguide helps a non-perfect room more than a standard speaker. I am 99% sure this jives with both Toole's and Geddes's theory. The off axis reflection in *any* room is more consistent with the on axis info with a CD speaker and thus closer to a better realization of what is suppose to be, and I think the empirical evidence to date supports this. If the studio room was messed up, you would also have the screw up in the realization, so that can't be dismissed. I am a 100% believer in a CD speaker. I have owned many of both and visited a lot of high end rooms of both. To me it is an argument that needs no further argument, but I can understand if others don't agree for whatever rationale. For me it was long term listening and ownership that proved it to me. * too narrow, as in the Danley's SM60F, made for less room effect but funny presentation on width/depth that was less than perfect in the long run but less of a compromise as many speakers I've heard to date.