Crossovers, anyone?

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 10379 times.

festuss

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #20 on: 20 Nov 2011, 12:23 pm »
FOCUS go to 16Hz, and with good aVA watts it's incredible  w w w.legacyaudio.com  Whispers not a deep but talk about resoulved BASS!!!  8 15" driven by the AVA P500 one on each side about 2400+ W is dynamic sonic REAL.  WATTS and surface area, there is no getting around it, if you want REAL.  Control teh room a tad and perfection is out there. 

avahifi

  • Industry Contributor
  • Posts: 4698
    • http://www.avahifi.com
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #21 on: 20 Nov 2011, 03:21 pm »
In general, replacing your current main power amplifier with a new AVA 400R or 600R will probably cost you less than going the route of stereo subwoofers, electronic crossover, and separate power amps for those subwoofers, be far easier to set up and use, and get the results you are hoping for.

At the best case you will realize way better performance from your main speakers, and likely all the deep CLEAN DEFINED bass you could hope for.  Problems solved.

At the worst case, you will still have the best sounding musicality from the range your speakers can actually play cleanly, and much better than you would have expected from them.

Almost all the add on subwoofers I have experienced are great at making very low frequency noises, never low frequency music.  I know of no "plate amp" that actually has high definition output at low frequencies.

Anyone who has heard the new 400R or 600R amps knows exactly what I am talking about.  If you have not yet heard one, you simply have never experienced true bass musicality from an audio system (half million dollar show setups possibly excluded).

Ask Jim Salk, or any of those fortunate 400R and 600R uses who have reported so enthusiastically here so far.

Regards,

Frank Van Alstine

jtwrace

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 11424
  • www.theintellectualpeoplepodcast.com
    • TIPP YouTube Channel
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #22 on: 20 Nov 2011, 03:31 pm »
In general, replacing your current main power amplifier with a new AVA 400R or 600R will probably cost you less than going the route of stereo subwoofers, electronic crossover, and separate power amps for those subwoofers, be far easier to set up and use, and get the results you are hoping for.

If one has a system that isn't capable of reproducing LF content how can an amp make any differenece?   :scratch:

rajacat

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 3239
  • Washington State
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #23 on: 20 Nov 2011, 03:57 pm »
Perhaps a couple of servo subs would complete your system. Just let your Tannoys' roll off naturally and let these subs fill in the bottom and fine tune with the built-in low pass filters.
http://www.rythmikaudio.com/products.html
http://gr-research.com/sw-12-16fr.aspx
http://gr-research.com/a370peq.aspx

festuss

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #24 on: 20 Nov 2011, 04:23 pm »
If one has a system that isn't capable of reproducing LF content how can an amp make any differenece?   :scratch:
I've heard different versions of AVA amplifiers running the same speakers, they do make a difference.  Tightened up the low end, whilst cleaning up the mids.  tighten up, isn't just Archie Bell and the Drells.  an amp that is capable of lots of watts and current, control the woofers better.  But if anyone is trying to get real bass out of minuscule speakers, it ain't gonna happen, We is talking rational full sized speakers, with some air moving ability.  Better amplifiers do control better.  AVA's does it extremely well.  Super extremely well, no slop, no mush.   the better the speakers the better they do it.  Why would you use crappy speakers anyway, if you are getting top quality AVA stuff, that would be stupid.

Tom Alverson

Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #25 on: 20 Nov 2011, 08:42 pm »
If one has a system that isn't capable of reproducing LF content how can an amp make any differenece?   :scratch:

If one has an amplifier that  isn't capable  of reproducting LF content how can a speaker make any difference?   :D

avahifi

  • Industry Contributor
  • Posts: 4698
    • http://www.avahifi.com
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #26 on: 20 Nov 2011, 09:23 pm »
Hey Tom,

You are only a couple of days from having a Fet Valve 600R show up at your front door (shipped on the 14th)!

Revisit this thread after you hear what a good amp can do for extended high definition deep bass response yourself.  :)

Frank

rcag_ils

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #27 on: 20 Nov 2011, 10:13 pm »
Quote
If one has an amplifier that  isn't capable  of reproducting LF content how can a speaker make any difference?

Sounds like one needs to have a speaker that can reproduce the LF first.

Frank is correct about most subs would just makes LF noise and nothing more, I've heard many for them in the "home theatre" systems powered by the run of the mill active subs like Polk Audio or Klipsch, which has little to do with music in my opinion. I have no idea what's in those active sub amp.

I think most good sub companies are gone.


festuss

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #28 on: 20 Nov 2011, 10:27 pm »
Most sold for teh masses are 80Hz boom boxes BLOSE POLK etc.  ther eis no bass, it boom boom boom  check real subs  www  legacyaudio.com

Brett Buck

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 393
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #29 on: 21 Nov 2011, 12:59 am »
Sounds like one needs to have a speaker that can reproduce the LF first.

    Indulge my story. Way back in the good old days of 1985, I was looking for new speakers. My amp - a Jensen's Stereo Shop MOSFET Control amp of  a Herculean 25 watts per channel.

     I went down to the best (and most honest) stereo shop in the Bay Area - Century Stereo in San Jose. They sold the B&W line. 801s were the best speakers at the time, but out of my price range at $4000. The 802s were at the upper limit at ~$1800. The 802s had the reputation of being very wimpy and not playing bass and the 801s were known as "power suckers". I went down first just to use their electronics, and sure enough, it seemed as if you needed a few hundred watts for the 801s and the 802s were gutless. This with the best stuff from Macintosh and Threshold. OK, that's conventional wisdom, and it was borne out.

    I went back, and got my little SCA-50 control amp. After some convincing, I got them to hook up the 802s using cut-up extension cords as speaker wire. They were all looking at this thing and telling me I was wasting my time. Fired everything up, and hey, now those 802s sounded pretty darn good, lots of bass punch now.  The one guy was in there with me, he goes and gets everybody else in the store (this was a Wednesday afternoon so there was NOTHING going on otherwise), and they ended up amazed and half of them were planning on calling Frank later that day.

  Then they got the idea that they should try it with the 801s. They had been driving them with 200-something watt Thresholds and they had all concluded that they "needed more". Wrong again. The wimpy little control amp drove them just fine at any sane power level. At some point, at a volume beyond where I would have played it, it appeared to start running out of poop, but that was 1/8 as much power as their "minimum requirements".

    The moral is that if you have an amp that can throw the current to it without falling apart,  it makes all the difference in the world how much bass you have. Speaker that "can't play bass"^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H  cant "reproduce LF content" all of a sudden CAN play bass.


Frank is correct about most subs would just makes LF noise and nothing more, I've heard many for them in the "home theatre" systems powered by the run of the mill active subs like Polk Audio or Klipsch, which has little to do with music in my opinion. I have no idea what's in those active sub amp.

     My experience with subwoofers has been similar. The one case that I though it made a clear improvement was my old Ohm subwoofer in my buddy's system. I had the thing sitting in my closet for 25 years, and he bought a system with some teeny mains. I can't recall the manufacturer (I really have no idea what is going on in retail hi-fi these days, I never go to magic cable stores, er, home entertainment system shop, so I wouldn't even venture a guess) but they looked kind of like off-brand B&W 805s. OK, but quite limited bass output, and driven my some sort of ADCOM integrated amp of unknown quality. We hooked up my old Ohm subwoofer and it was pretty much the same issue that made me put it in the closet the first time, not much if any extension and heavy overlap with the mains, causing a huge hump in the response. HE liked it OK and left it as it was. A few weeks later he calls me and says the foam surrounds have all fallen apart. Not a huge surprise. I looked around and found that Ohm still supplies replacement drivers. While on the phone to get them (very reasonable price, by the way), we mentioned the other issue, and the good people at Ohm said they would include some port tuning that might help. We replaced the drivers, they work but the same problem persists. Then we stick in the port inserts, and WOW, great increase in extension, and virtually NO overlap. Good on you, Ohm acoustics. It wasn't as good in terms of definition as I would have liked, but it definitely added a good bass presence that was lacking before.

   Note that these were PASSIVE subwoofers, that have a crossover inside, no amplifier, and not adjustable in terms of crossover frequency. I expect that you could almost always solve the overlap issue if you had an adjustable crossover and an active amplifier, but the definition still comes down to how good the amp is in the subwoofer.

    Brett

srb

Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #30 on: 21 Nov 2011, 01:36 am »
I would like to indulge your story, but the Nelson Pass Threshold Stasis S/500 of 1985 may have been overpriced @ ~ $3000, and although it didn't have the current capability of today's amplifiers, it could output a healthy 22A per channel.  I doubt the SCA-50, however modified, could muster that amount of current.
 
Steve

rcag_ils

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #31 on: 21 Nov 2011, 01:48 am »
Quote
The moral is that if you have an amp that can throw the current to it without falling apart,  it makes all the difference in the world how much bass you have. Speaker that "can't play bass"^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H  cant "reproduce LF content" all of a sudden CAN play bass.

My comment didn't mean to direct toward speakers that are in the B&W 801 league. If I had a pair of 801 that had no bass, yes, I would question the amp. My comment is more general in nature, if a speaker is not capable of reproducing LF, it doesn't matter how capable your amp is as far as receating LF, you would not hear it, because your speaker can't do it. My comment is not brand specific.

As far as LF reproduction, using a well design sub is the most ideal way, anything other than this is all about compromising. If you pulled the woofer off the 801 put it in a separate box, design an active crossover with the correct slope, doing it right is better than sticking it in the same box with the mid and high drivers. You can never get the optimal positioning for the woofer this way.

I power my sub with a 60w/ch amp, with no problem.

Æ

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 859
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #32 on: 21 Nov 2011, 02:02 am »
Perhaps a couple of servo subs would complete your system. Just let your Tannoys' roll off naturally and let these subs fill in the bottom and fine tune with the built-in low pass filters.
http://www.rythmikaudio.com/products.html
http://gr-research.com/sw-12-16fr.aspx
http://gr-research.com/a370peq.aspx

+1
(I second your excellent suggestion)

bummrush

Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #33 on: 21 Nov 2011, 02:08 am »
Also 99% of bass depends entirely if it's on the recording in the first place and  second most people would rather have a big bang instead of quality .

Tom Alverson

Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #34 on: 21 Nov 2011, 04:12 am »
Hey Tom,

You are only a couple of days from having a Fet Valve 600R show up at your front door (shipped on the 14th)!

Revisit this thread after you hear what a good amp can do for extended high definition deep bass response yourself.  :)

Frank

I have the Fet Valve 600R now and put it in my living room setup on my TV/computer system on some B&W 630i speakers I picked up used for about $400.  My "good" speakers are downstairs in my listening room which is not set up at the moment.  When I got these B&W 630i speakers I hooked them up to an old Transcendence amp and fed right from the sound card output of the PC.  It sounded pretty decent but the speakers sounded muddy in the bass (and compared to the current setup had much less clarity at all frequencies).  I now have the Fet Valve 600R hooked up to them being driven by the Vision combo preamp/dac fed from the SPDIF output of the PC.  The clarity at all frequencies is much better now and the bass better than I ever expected from these speakers.  They are spec'ed flat to 53HZ (2dB down).  I would much rather listen to this bass (even though it might lack a little reproducing movie explosions) that what I had before, even if I were to add a sub-woofer to the old setup.

 


Brett Buck

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 393
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #35 on: 21 Nov 2011, 04:32 am »
I would like to indulge your story, but the Nelson Pass Threshold Stasis S/500 of 1985 may have been overpriced @ ~ $3000, and although it didn't have the current capability of today's amplifiers, it could output a healthy 22A per channel.  I doubt the SCA-50, however modified, could muster that amount of current.

    I think the point was that the little wimpy 25-watt ($425) jobbie in a surplus Dynaco box made bass come out where none was before and blew Threshold and Macintoshes best at the time into the water. Easily.

     Brett

rcag_ils

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #36 on: 21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am »
Quote
I would much rather listen to this bass (even though it might lack a little reproducing movie explosions) that what I had before, even if I were to add a sub-woofer to the old setup.

If your speakers can only go down to 53Hz, then you could have had the world's greatest amp, all you'd get is 53Hz. Now add a good sub, connect it back to your previous amp, then do a fair comparison, if you really want to hear the power, weight, and visceral impact from the bottom octave, you'd need a good sub.

festuss

  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 105
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #37 on: 21 Nov 2011, 11:58 am »
McIntosh is on it's last years.  It has become a "lifestyle" product.  They ain't interested in audio no mo'.  Since becoming part of D&M after Philips sold off Marantz and formed Denon/Marantz, D&M has taken over McIntosh, and ruined it, and has added more brands to it's pile of "lifestyle" stuff for anything it ever had, which was basically well made, overpriced, under performing stuff, that lasts forever, but who cares. And looks nice, but AVA P500's Hafler(1200W+) ea  beat a pair of mono block Mc's(500W ea)  some time  ago, so well that the Mc's where sold for $6K/pr!! they hold their value.... as what?  Don't know but the AVA OmegaStar EXR I believe we used in mono with Ultra-Hybrid phase inverter, smoked the Mc's the price difference for AVA, BETTER performing versus over priced Mc's had him put a few grand into his pocket.   AVA, specs matter and they just do it right always.  Read up on the D&M Holdings  turmoil, as it fades into oblivion.  AVA 40+ years and still cranking out great stuff, priced for mortals.  Marantz is doomed too, Philips shoulda done teh buying not selling and do a HARMAN, grow audio, not get out of it, they also sold off AKG to Harman back in teh 80's, but HARMAN Int'l is a sound company, audio is their business, not "lifestyles".  AKG still best mics .

Tom Alverson

Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #38 on: 21 Nov 2011, 03:10 pm »
If your speakers can only go down to 53Hz, then you could have had the world's greatest amp, all you'd get is 53Hz. Now add a good sub, connect it back to your previous amp, then do a fair comparison, if you really want to hear the power, weight, and visceral impact from the bottom octave, you'd need a good sub.

53Hz is the 2dB point.  They go much lower than that.  If I had heard a subwoofer that gave me more power, weight  and visceral impact than I am getting now (which is pretty good) I might be interested.  My "good" speakers in my listening room go lower than this.

avahifi

  • Industry Contributor
  • Posts: 4698
    • http://www.avahifi.com
Re: Crossovers, anyone?
« Reply #39 on: 21 Nov 2011, 03:17 pm »
Hi Tom,

I hope you can get the 600R on your good speakers one of these days soon and write a full report here.  Probably in the Fet Valve 600R and 400R thread rather than here under crossovers where it probably will not get as much notice.

Frank