Nobody can explain in simple english what an ideal specification should be for a speaker cable as far as resistance/inductance/capacitance.
Most of us don't know a square wave from a grommet- and are lucky to find that our systems work at all. Somtimes it's no wonder that people just "give up" and buy what the "golden ears" tell us to buy because it's just so "airy", or "natural", or whatever.
On a recent thread I asked about a "recommended" speaker cable with .037uh inductance and 349pf capacitance and Frank said that would be a 'nasty load'. Fair enough. I'll buy in. (10khz square wave,...)-
So, how come all the speaker guys keep talking about low resistance and inductance? Must be a disconnect somewhere

( no pun intended)
Recently saw a square wave chart (graph) on a cable guy's website that showed a pretty good looking "match" with their cable which happened to have low resistance/high capacitance. Now, I'll admit that this guy recommends an RC network (Zobel?) with "some" amplifiers. So you can see why a non-technical audiophile like me would be confused. What the hell is a Zobel?
Somebody is zooming somebody- but you can't tell me that using high resistance lamp cord from Radio Shack is the ideal way to go for somone that is serious about making good music in their living room. In fact, seems to me that I read on AVA's website (old newsletters) that Frank even 'kinda' liked a cable that had almost five times the capacitance of the Radio Shack speaker cable.
So---, I will try this again--,
Is there a resistance/inductance/capacitance set of parameters that us stupid hi-fi nuts should be looking for?- or should we just be at the mercy of conflicting views by the "know it alls" and when we screw-up- only then be told " I told you so".
Good grief
WEEZ