There are other ways to interpret that crude experiment. One: The microphones and recording system equipment and placement were not adequate.
The guy that set the whole thing up is a studio sound engineer, he works in one of the better studios here. I can only hope he actually knows what he is doing...
Two: Since a change was noticed between the original recording and the next recording three days later maybe there really was a change during burn in and the majority (or all) of it took place in the first three days.
Yup, my conclusion as well... This is also a more heard suggesion, and I tend to agree.
I am not arguing for any of those interpretations just pointing out that your conclusion is only one of several available and ignored the change between the first and third day. I also caution that the results from one piece of equipment cannot be extrapolated to all equipment.
Agreed. This was an experiment with just one set, which is not enough basis for a solid statement.
I want to believe. 
Me too...
