You're doing fine.
Even back in your first post I felt you struck on it. 'wholeness, balance, natural and honest.
I see them as a neutral, dynamic clean palate. Bob's speakers are purely brilliant logical solutions.
I'm only on what, rev 2's or what ever, and he's improved from there? 
-Monitoring at CathouseSound AetherAudio 'Continuum A.D. and TimePiece 'Mini
Indeed they are very neutral, dynamic and clean sounding. I didn't get that much into the spatial abilities of the TP3.0's though, but it's certainly worth highlighting as one of their outspoken traits. The soundstage really locks into place with wonderful ambient retrieval, "fill," and the speakers seem to disappear altogether.
The aspect regarding "fill" may need a little elaboration, since it is one of the things that sets the natural tone of the TP3.0's, in my ears at least. In comparison the Raidho Ayra C-1's, and even some of their larger siblings(with the exception of the fantastic C-4's) to a minor extent, may seem a tad anemic and perhaps even "out of focus" in a peculiar way. It leads to some thoughts:
Quite often(read: for the very most part) when listening to a wide variety of speakers one gets the immediate sensation of listening to "hifi," and that may further lead into adhering to a particular mindset, if you will, where the sound generated in front of you is assimilated into a substitute of the real thing, almost as an entity in itself - pushing the term "hifi" somewhat into obscurity, yet without giving fully in to the music at a subconscious level. With this in mind I'll dwell on some impressions of the C-1's, before coming back to the outset:
Though extremely refined and delicate, among many other qualities, the Raidho C-1's have nevertheless placed in me the feeling of being held at arms length to the event, leaving me to ponder in awe over the intricate nuances in the presentation, as well as the elegance of it all. Yet, somehow that's where I'm left, to ponder over these intricate delicacies and never getting fully involved with the sensation of witnessing a real musical event - admittedly no small feat in itself. A friend of mine mentioned how he felt the C-1's were slightly manipulative in their sound when compared with the TP3.0's, and I actually agree with him - it's a well put observation. Earlier, in some of my conversations with Karsten, and before the TP3.0's in my own setup, I circled the notion of the C-1's being rather gentle and polite, and though doubtful whether this observation held any merit as something distracting from the "realness" of the sound, it stayed with me, and eventually had me more invested in, and ultimately reviving my initial impressions of the TP3.0's(that I'd auditioned some months prior).
The fill of the sound that's now entered with the TP3.0's in my setup is perceived as an ability to, well, fill out the sound as an intrinsic or inherent and natural quality - planting a textural, physical and organic feel - and in turn it contributes having me give up the subconscious struggle to maintain the particular mindset of the above mentioned "hifi"-feel, subtle it may be, as a stand-in. Moreover, the slight sensation of "out of focus" mentioned in conjunction with the C-1's stand opposed to the TP3.0's ability to lock into focus, and this as well puts me in a relaxed state where I seem not to, again, struggle to keep up the suspension of disbelief; the music feels more accessible and
real. Coupled with the overall ease and balance of presentation in the TP3.0's it's something that really has me appreciating music as such, as
music. It's actually giving in to music in relief.
Some may feel the C-1's to be more refined and delicate, though in the end I almost find it to be a subtle emphasis at the expense of the wholeness, the core and substance of the sound - not as a distraction in itself, but somehow standing alone. In my ears the TP3.0's redirect the attention to the music itself, in full vigor. The presentation just clicks into place, in more than one sense...
