Balanced Vs. RCA

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 7059 times.

DVV

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1138
Balanced Vs. RCA
« Reply #20 on: 21 Feb 2004, 07:37 am »
Quote from: Psychicanimal

Had to be the Serbian hope... :lol:


Yo soy un hombre sincero, compadre, and you know it. True, I'm also an audio freak, but hey, nobody's perfect. The trick is to turn your imperfection into a virtue. :mrgreen:

At the very least, it helps with the wife in cases of unauthorized purchases, which you might experience yourself if you ever do marry. In which case, I am sure you will exercise extreme ground control. :lol:

But seriously Francisco, you have tried it, you know what ground noise control can do. I think you'll agree it's up to us who have tried it to spread the word.

Cheers,
DVV

Harmon

Balanced Component
« Reply #21 on: 21 Feb 2004, 04:57 pm »
Does any know if the Jeff Rowland audio components are fully balanced systems or not?

PhilNYC

Re: Balanced Component
« Reply #22 on: 21 Feb 2004, 07:51 pm »
Quote from: Harmon
Does any know if the Jeff Rowland audio components are fully balanced systems or not?


I believe the answer is yes, although I don't know if it's true for every single product in their line.

zybar

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 12087
  • Dutch and Dutch 8C's…yes they are that good!
Balanced Vs. RCA
« Reply #23 on: 21 Feb 2004, 07:59 pm »
My Rowland 201 monos are fully balanced.

In fact, they ONLY come with XLR input.

GW

markC

Balanced Vs. RCA
« Reply #24 on: 21 Feb 2004, 10:08 pm »
Hey, that must be some mic in your telephone' as most phone mics don't don't do 20 hz to 20khz or even close for that matter. I know that they don't come close to 20 hz cause I was talking to a friend on the phone while playing around with my subs , (they were the only speaks playing), and he couldn't here a thing, even with the phone held right up to the sub.