Audio equipment we would like to hear our Bryston amplifiers driving

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 40072 times.

Napalm

Not a fan of woodgrain Nap?  :?

The wood is fine.... the shape though... it suggest me a safety lantern...

Nap.  :D

Ryanz

The wood is fine.... the shape though... it suggest me a safety lantern...

Nap.  :D

 :lol: I didn't even notice. You're right.

srb

The Salk Soundscapes now have a molded mid/tweeter top section that allows the thick damping layer to be recessed into the bottom.  I think this gives the speaker a more unified and streamlined look.
 
Steve
 
 

JohnR

According to Jim Salk, "The speakers look the way they do because that is the way they had to look in order to sound the way they do." You can read my interview with Jim Salk and Dennis Murphy here:

http://www.hifizine.com/2010/06/salk-signature-soundscape-speaker/

Napalm

According to Jim Salk, "The speakers look the way they do because that is the way they had to look in order to sound the way they do."

I can understand that. However there is some kind of contradiction here - if it's strictly an utilitarian design, why bother with exotic veneers and high gloss lacquer....

Nap.  :dunno:

srb

I can understand that. However there is some kind of contradiction here - if it's strictly an utilitarian design, why bother with exotic veneers and high gloss lacquer....

It is not a "strictly utilitarian" design. It just happens to have an unusual shape for the top module determined by sound goals.  There is no reason that it can't be finished just like any other speaker that integrates into a home setting.
 
Other speakers like the B&W 802, 801 and 800 were also designed with minimum baffle and diffraction for the mid and tweeter elements, and they too are unconventional looking.
 
I myself prefer a rectangular profile for looks, but I can understand and respect the physical design choices made for a statement loudspeaker that was intended to have the best possible imaging.
 
Steve

Napalm

Other speakers like the B&W 802, 801 and 800 were also designed with minimum baffle and diffraction for the mid and tweeter elements, and they too are unconventional looking.

Dunno Steve, I've seen many pro studio monitors, where the looks really don't count, and they are most of the time "finished" with flat black paint and look b**t ugly, but never have I seen their designers resorting to some weird "nautilus" shapes in order to achieve good sound....

Nap.  :scratch:

Phil A

Many moons ago I had a pair of Thiel 2.3s in shiny black laminate (my Thiel MCS1 center is still that way and I have an old Thiel SCS2 center that way in the bedroom and on occasion drag out the other shiny black laminate SCS2 for the rear center in the main system - I had the SCS2s main moons ago as rear channels in the main system) and while I like the look at first, over time, the finish wore out on me.  I had a Pioneer Elite TV in the main system too with that finish.  I've also seen the ($40k ish) Linn Artikulat in that finish and I thought it looked too overwhelming in person.

Phil A

The Artikulat 350As (A as in Activ with built in amps) are that price range and there is a picture in that finish on their website -  http://www.linn.co.uk/klimax#

Laundrew

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 7174
  • "Sometimes it rains inside my head..."
Dunno Steve, I've seen many pro studio monitors, where the looks really don't count, and they are most of the time "finished" with flat black paint and look b**t ugly, but never have I seen their designers resorting to some weird "nautilus" shapes in order to achieve good sound....

Nap.  :scratch:




 :P

Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder.

As is audio quality, aesthetics are also extremely important to me. I deeply appreciate and respect individuals whom dare to cut their way through the cardboard walls and work outside of the proverbial box. Remember that the audio equipment that we select will become immersed in our household décor - some individuals even have industrial robots in their rooms to enhance their “digs.“  :scratch:

Be well… 


srb

Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder.

As is audio quality, aesthetics are also extremely important to me. I deeply appreciate and respect individuals whom dare to cut their way through the cardboard walls and work outside of the proverbial box. Remember that the audio equipment that we select will become immersed in our household décor...

I understand and agree with that.  There have been highly rated and much loved components and speakers that I didn't buy just because I didn't like the looks.  Speakers are audio transducers and furniture, and are highly subjective and personal.  Even more of a consideration if you are co-habitating with a significant other.
 
There is no right or wrong on the physical perception any more than there is on the audible perception.
 
The B&W Nautilus that you showed is not my personal cup of tea.  I know I would frequently catch them out of the corner of my eye and get an emotional flash from the Alien movies.  But if I saw them in your home, I would ask if I could very gently run my hands over them.
 
Likewise, there have been sculptures I have seen at art museums that I was fascinated with and found it hard to look away, but I would not want to live with them in my home environment.
 
Steve

vegasdave

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 4039
    • My online rock magazine-Crypt Magazine

Depends on how you like your gear sounding........to me Mcintosh and Bryston are both built like TANKS and of course they are  both made in North America and both have a long history as companies,but their sound could not be further from one another........Bryston=Open,Transparent,Linear,Detailed and very lively Sound............Mcintosh=Dark,Velvety,Soft,Tube Like(even their Solid State amps).............I lean much towards the Bryston  sound  :hyper:

I agree, both are extremely well built.

I like both, but yeah, I lean towards the Bryston sound as well. I wouldn't be owning it otherwise!

Napalm

Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder.

Agreed.



Nap.  :P

vegasdave

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 4039
    • My online rock magazine-Crypt Magazine

Napalm


Ryanz

Agreed.



Nap.  :P

Now that's a nice setup. :drool: I know everyone has their own personal preference when it comes to aesthetics and sound, but sometimes I'm just lost as to how people can find some of these speakers appealing.



 
A simple design is my cup of tea though. 

vegasdave

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 4039
    • My online rock magazine-Crypt Magazine

Laundrew

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 7174
  • "Sometimes it rains inside my head..."
Agreed.



Nap.  :P

And then there is most exquisite beauty….



 :P

Be well...

Ryanz

And then there is most exquisite beauty….



 :P

Be well...

Those are pretty sweet. What are they?

Napalm

Thanks.

Beware that they are "size challenged" too. I.e. they're ginormous.

Nap.