Dial M for Murder

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 1198 times.

jsaliga

  • Restricted
  • Posts: 1630
  • Vinyl Provocateur
    • The Spinning Record
Dial M for Murder
« on: 21 Mar 2010, 02:55 pm »


They sure don't make 'em like they used to.  I know that's a fairly common lament of older film buffs such as myself, but movies that emphasize story and characters seem few and far between these days.  So I remain resolute in my conviction that with rare exception Hollywood has largely turned itself into a gigantic CGI clearinghouse, where the stars of its motion pictures are the computer animators -- not the actors.  These days story seems to be little more than a device for the filmmaker to present a series of visually stunning, if not entirely unbelievable, effects shots that are loosely connected by actors filling the dead space between effects sequences.  Thanks but no thanks.  After seeing Star Trek some weeks ago I have to conclude that J.J. Abrams doesn't have even a fraction of the filmmaking talent of someone like Alfred Hitchcock, John Ford, or Howard Hawks.  I'm sure that my distaste for these movies says something about my preferences that not everyone shares -- so to each his own.  Moving on...

Last night I sat down to Dial M for Murder, a real movie, with real direction, real acting, a real set, and a compelling story.  I have not watched this film in several years and therefore many of the finer details were not fresh in my mind, so I thought it was time to see it again.  This 1954 suspense picture was directed by Alfred Hitchcock and adapted to the big screen from the devilishly clever play of the same name, written by Frederic Knott.  To me the movie has all of the hallmarks of a truely great film.  A riveting story, the Broadway play ran for 552 performances largely on the strengths of Knott's crafty writing.  While the idea of a husband plotting the murder of his wife is hardly original, the very clever way in which the story is literally unlocked with a latch key was a stroke of genius, IMO.  There is superb casting and acting, with the unflappable Ray Milland as the scheming husband Tony Wendice, Grace Kelly as his wife Margot, and John Williams as Inspector Hubbard (a role he reprises from the play and for which he won a Tony Award in 1953).  A brilliant filmmaker in Alfred Hitchcock at the helm, nothing further need be said about him.  And Robert Burks as Director of Photography, who's cinematic touch has graced several Hitchcock films in addition to movies such as Hondo, House of Wax, The Spirit of St. Louis, and The Music Man.

The film mostly takes place in the Wendice's flat.  The story is character and dialogue driven, and will probably not appeal to card carrying members of the CGI action film club.  But that being said, if you appreciate clever story telling, nuanced performance, great cinematography with lighting and color to set the proper mood and atmosphere, and a film featuring the directing talents of a true master then you'll enjoy this film for the work of art that it is.  If you're a movie lover and appreciate a great mystery/suspense film then you owe it to yourself to see Dial M for Murder at least once, and then afterwards you should take a look at Strangers on a Train, Rear Window, Vertigo, and Psycho, if you haven't already seen them.

--Jerome
« Last Edit: 22 Mar 2010, 01:20 am by jsaliga »

jazzcourier

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 413
Re: Dial M for Murder
« Reply #1 on: 21 Mar 2010, 06:04 pm »
Hitch was on on quite a tear during this time....EVERYTHING......BRILLIANT ! Maybe no other director with this kind of track record.....Remember this film was released in 3D ! Had the pleasure of viewing this masterpiece in 3D and that red phone...................Don't forget the other stage adaptation for screen..."Rope"...once again,a claustrophobic setting...almost all in one room,this one with his favorite object of desire, Farley Grainger, who Hitch also paired with the spooky Robert Walker in "Strangers on a train"-in both these films there is a strong homosexual thing going on that adds to the tension because of the "veiled" undercurrent of male to male attraction.It is right there on the screen,a little more obvious now..............

TheChairGuy

Re: Dial M for Murder
« Reply #2 on: 21 Mar 2010, 06:08 pm »
A great, great movie...as were many Hitchcock films (Strangers on a Train perhaps being my fave of his).  Grace Kelly was an exquisite beauty with acting chops, too :thumb:

As well, I thought JJ Abrahm's Star Trek was a fine and enjoyable film, too.  As different as can be from a nuanced and often sublime undertones in Hitchcock films, but just fine on it's own merits.

John

martyo

Re: Dial M for Murder
« Reply #3 on: 21 Mar 2010, 06:19 pm »
Yep, we're Hitchcock heads over here. Great movie.

Scott F.

Re: Dial M for Murder
« Reply #4 on: 22 Mar 2010, 12:58 am »
Great call on the Hitchcock. I haven't watched them in a long time. I'll have to pick up a few of them next time I hit Best Buy.

Here's one that you've probably forgotten about,

A Lion in Winter


The interaction between O'Toole and Hepburn is some of the best acting that you'll likely see. Then there are the three scheming, treacherous sons (Anthony Hopkins, John Castle, Nigel Terry) vying for the throne. The acting and cinematography in this film are simply stellar.

This is one of my all time favorite movies.