I assume it's OK to ask Buss-specific questions here, Danny?
This is really hypothetical since I don't own a Buss (yet
) or a Torus, but would there be any benefit in combining a Buss with a Torus or Richard Gray Substation-like isolation transformer.
I'd think that the power delivered from an iso tranny is as good as it can get, but maybe this is a naive notion?
I'd also guess that if one did combine them then the Buss would go after the iso tranny?
Any experience with this type of set-up?
And while I'm here, is it OK to plug digital sources and amplification into the same Uberbuss, or will the AC nasties from the digital then enter the amp via the Buss (or are the outlets in the Buss isolated so that the digital won't interfere w/ the amps). Or is it best to run the digital gear on its own Buss?
Thanks for any info!
-Mike
Mike,
Thanks for the questions. I'm glad they are easy ones, I haven't had enough coffee, yet.
Let me tell you of my own (last, before Dodd battery gear) system, thereby answering your questions.
My power chain runs like this Panel with a whole house surge arrestor > homerun to listening room > wall outlet > Topaz 2.5KVA ultra isolation transformer > UberBUSS > gear.
When I started on the ultimate quiet system, I implemented the iso transformer and saw a very large drop in line noise. I was using a PS Audio P300 PowerPlant at that time to power the front end (Cary CD306-200 and much modified Cary SLP50B) and had my Cary CAD572SEMkII monoblocks plugged into the Topaz, along with the P300. Then I built my first prototype on the MajikBUSS and was amazed at the reduction of noise that the Topaz just didn't stop. More than that there was an increase in the dynamics of the system, especially the digital sources. At that point, the P300 became irrelevant and was removed from the system. Then I built the UberBUSS. It was apparent to me and everyone else that listened to the system that the Uber was actually more effective than the Topaz at removing the line crud, but when used in combination there was a synergy between the two units that was and is magical. I will be using this combo one the music server, DAC and subamps in the new system.
One of the things that an iso tranny does not do is Power Factor Correction. This enables any transformer or inductive load plugged into an Uber or Majik to run considerably more efficiently. The result is a great sense of dynamic headroom, system punch, macro and micro detail delineation and slightly higher ovcerall system sensitivity. My system, as described above, was 0.8dB louder at 1KHz simply by plugging it into an UberBUSS.
Each circuit of the Majik and Uber (2- 'A' & 'B') have filtration to preclude RFI and EMI from cross contaminating the gear plugged into the unit. That is why I recommend that analog gear should be plugged into one circuit and digital gear into the other. If you have a particularly noisey system (like a Sunfire amp along with a complex digital front end) I can add more filtration if needed, but these situations are pretty far between and the stock units work VERY well at isolation.
The best my system ever sounded was an Uber plugged into the wall with the Topaz next and an Uber after the Topaz. I seldom got to hear it that way because I kept selling one of the Ubers. I purposely built an Uber that had a crappy finish so I would quite selling that one out of my system to people that wanted one already broken in

One caveat on iso transformers. The ONLY one that I tried in my system that was not current limiting was the Topaz @ 2.5KVA. Remember, my system was a 20WPC Class A system that did not make huge current demands. We have tried my Topaz with large SS amps and even @ 2.5 KVA there was a blunting of high current transients. The Majik and the Uber are not current limiting in any way.
I hope this answers your questions. If not, ask away.
dave