0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2550 times.
Looks like it's just a fan with an activated charcoal filter.I've got a little electric space heater that has a charcoal filter on the back. I suppose I could just turn it to fan-only and use it for removing fumes.Should be easy enough to diy something that will do the trick too.
Quote from: turkey on 4 Nov 2009, 08:18 pmLooks like it's just a fan with an activated charcoal filter.I've got a little electric space heater that has a charcoal filter on the back. I suppose I could just turn it to fan-only and use it for removing fumes.Should be easy enough to diy something that will do the trick too.And you're going to go through all that effort, even when one is available for just $26?You are hardcore!Anand.
I can also get a muffin fan for a buck or two and a whole foam sleeve prefilter to cut up and use as filters for $7-8.
Quote from: turkey on 4 Nov 2009, 09:16 pmI can also get a muffin fan for a buck or two and a whole foam sleeve prefilter to cut up and use as filters for $7-8.Yes, but this has the "Proprietary FUMINATOR ROTAFILTER system that draws fume away from operator and provides filtration 8 times better than a stationary filter" (which it also has at the rear) The ATMOSCOPE FUMINATOR Primary Rotating Filters are $19.90/5-pack And the ATMOSCOPE FUMINATOR Stationary Filters are $23.76/5-pack It's interesting that the solid filters cost more. Obviously the rotafilters started life out as solid filters, and in another manufacturing process had holes punched in them. I guess it's because the activated charcoal was impregated afterward, and the solid filters have more charcoal? Anyway, I also find it interesting that punching holes in the filter and rotating it gave them not twice the effectiveness, but 8 times. Turkey, your DIY challenge just became slightly more difficult! Steve
I've never seen this rotating filter idea before. It would be nice if they showed some test results to prove it actually is 8 times more effective.