0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2430 times.
more like the horrible bastard child of Oasis and Harry Connick Jr?
Quotemore like the horrible bastard child of Oasis and Harry Connick Jr?That would be my guess. I got his first breakout album (twentysomething) and then was sent (free) his live "special" concert in some church somewhere...heard nothing there that makes me want to pick up his later albums. I think he is more on the "pop" side of things. Kinda' like real flavoured drink vs. real fruit juice. Like Kenny G vs. Kenny Garret.Sure he is talented, but I wouldn't think of the genre, jazz, at the thought of him. There is jazz, and there is jazzzzz.
Crap...couldn't find where I put JC...must be buried somewhere in the "dungeon".I remember "seeing" on Amazon that the 'limited edition' live cd I was sent was going for some big time money a couple years ago, over a hundred $$$. I don't see it listed under his name anymore.Was it 'Live from Chapel Union'?
I was watching Gran Torino this evening (which was super cool), and enjoyed the song "Gran Torino" played through the credits. Amongst other things, I really liked the vocal performance of some guy called Jamie Cullum. Well, I felt like an idiot when I discovered that he's quite famous, and really successful (to the extent that British jazz musicians are ever successful). Anyway, it seems that he's only sort of a jazz musician, and sort of a pop singer, and sort of all over the map with his musical styles. Not that there's anything wrong with that. In fact, I find myself increasingly drawn to artists who don't fit neatly into musical categories these days. But the tiny three lettered word "pop" always makes me pause, as it usually indicates music that, in an effort to secure commercial success, ends up being totally disposable. I guess I'm wondering if anyone has a feeling for how true this is of Jamie Cullum's music.Right now I'm listening to samples from his new album (http://www.jamiecullum.com/) and I'm not sure what to make of it all. Some of the arrangements seem a little theatrical, in a cheap way, and some of the songs seem a bit weak. But then again, this guy actually plays piano like he knows what he's doing. And while his voice is far from perfect, there's something truly expressive about his singing that makes me want to like his music. So, should I be thinking of Jamie Cullum as a British Chet Baker for the new Millenium? Or more like the horrible bastard child of Oasis and Harry Connick Jr?Chad