bitch slapping or otherwise, here we go...
like it or not, 'the masses acceptance rate' is what determines the fate of all technologies, including vinyl, cd, cassette tape, reel to reel etc...
why should CD's be held in the same reverence as vinyl? personally I don't think they are and I doubt any of you do either. Vinyl is and has been for the past 15 years an enthusiast's toy, not a mass market item, cassette, cd, minidisc (location specific to Japan) and now DVDa and SACD are all different formats and they all have had or will have their day to varying success. Why should the currently all conquering CD be any different?
Whether this technology described in the article is 'the one' to replace the cd or not is another matter, but I firmly believe that CD's will not be the media of choice in another 5-10 years.
blank cd's cost about $25 when they first came out, burners cost over $1000, now they cost less than 5% of those figures and operate 40+ times faster... why would solid state media or even wireless, high bandwidth streaming technologies be any different? today's price for anything has little relevance to tomorrow's. We all know that cd's cost a few dollars in production, but how much do you PAY? a few dollars? I don't think so...
in 1995 when I first got online with my own home dialup account, I was a rarity in Australia. It cost me over $30 a month for an account with VERY frequent dropouts at only 5400 bits per second for a maximum of 9 hours a month. Now (in Singapore) for half that price I can get approximately 270 times that speed(1.5 kb/s) via cable and unlimited access. In another 5 years I don't see why I couldn't get that same speed as today but wireless, everywhere I go for the same or less money.
As more and more music goes online for distribution and more and more people get faster 'wireless connected' devices, the logical step is to distribute the product (music) either by download or streaming to those devices. For us, that means less or no physical media to buy, or higher prices for that which can be bought (ala the current vinyl situation).
I'm confident to say that within 5 years I will not have any reason to buy another CD or a new cd player to replace that which I have when it dies. By then everything I currently own will be on my audio server and anything new will be downloadable at CD quality or better.
Personally, vinyl is not in the picture - like it or not, it is an will remain the domain of people who are prepared to spend hours trawling through other people's throw aways in second hand stores or willing to spend $50 on an album that you could buy on cd for $17. it is an 'exclusive' sub-set of the crazy audiophile subspecies that we are all part of.