Hi all, I've been lurking for the past little while doing some reading and research. I've been involved in audio for about 16 years and a member over at Head-Fi for about 1 1/2. Since I discovered good headphones they have become my primary source for serious listening.
My wife and I are moving next month and I'm working on setting up a dedicated headphone listening system in the computer room. Right now I have Audio Technica AT-W100 headphones and a Singlepower PPX3 tube headphone amp on order. What I need is a new CDP that's of decent quality and "musical" but not to expensive.
I'll have to admit that my exposure to decent quality CD players has been limited in the last few years. I live in Prince Edward Island, Canada and as such we don't really have any high end audio dealers. I did manage to get to a shop in Halifax a few weeks ago where I got to hear the new Cambridge Audio Azur 540C and 640C. I'll have to admit I was mightly impressed with both but especially the 640C. IMO, It easily bettered an older Arcam CD72 they had there. It just had this sense of ease that didn't give up any of the detail. It was bigger, smoother and more quiet sounding. After the listening session I had my mind made up on the 640C at about half the price of the Arcam it seems like a bargain to me.
I've had a few discussions with a fellow Head-Fier on the benefits of non-oversampling, filterless DAC's but, until I read a review over at Head-Fi that talked about the TubeDac I had been under the impression that only Audio Note and 47 Labs were building players or DAC's with this philosophy in mind. Needless to say I've been intrigued. What gets me though is a lot of the traits ascribed to filterless, non-oversampling DAC's would be how I would describe some of the traits of the 640C.
I've read the TubeDac can tend towards richness in vocals, especially female vocals. This is appealing but at the same time my headphones already have a rather rich midrange and adding a tube headphone amp will probably only increase this by a degree so my worry with the TubeDac would too much of a good thing. I've considered the dAck! as well but it's at the upper end of my budget ($500-550 US) and I would still need a transport of some sort. I'll admit that I'm still leaning heavily towards the Cambridge but I'm still curious about filterless, non-oversampling designs. I'm also open to suggestions.
So I guess my biggest question is has anyone who has a TubeDac or dAck! heard the Cambridge 640C and if so how did they compare? If I were to go the TubeDac route I would stick with the regular version and upgrade the power supply at a later date. Is the TubeDac still acceptable without the upgraded ps? Going this route would leave approximately $150-200 in my budget for a transport, any suggestions? I'm also open to any other suggestions people might have.
Sorry for rambling and thanks for your time.
PS