I am not talking about physically not fitting in the room, but from a sonic standpoint. Are there reasons why a pair of large, high quality floor standing speakers would not sound good in a smaller room due the physical size of the room alone?
Thanks,
RDS
I can speak from experience here. I am new to this forum, because some other boards are populated with shall we say…sick inmates.
Anyway, I live in an
all-concrete residence. Floor, ceiling, walls all concrete and brick. My listening lounge is
18 x 14 feet.
I tried to use larger floor standers, but some required placement far from the back or side walls, and more space to breathe than my room allowed.
Already, I have near-perfect bass reinforcement. There is so little loss, that even the smallest speakers sound pretty big.
A large floor stander would have absurdly overpowering bass. The bass would be slow and murky. I visited an American chap that works for my company. He has some large floor standing speakers with dual 12” woofers. They are simply choked for space, and the bass was bloody awful.
They are less than 1 foot from the back and side walls. The shout is pretty bad.
Can you guess what brand I speak of? I know they should at least have crisper bass attack. They would if he had space.
Another thing that happens, is a node or standing waves. There might be a rise in mid bass thickness that is unacceptable colour. I was faced with both issues at one time or another. My listening position was in the center of standing waves, and bass was canceling itself at that junction. It was thin sounding. Dynamics and usable SPL was lower also.
Mini monitors and a sub in my place provide full range response, flexibility of setup, and superior imaging. That is compared to a large, wide baffle floor stander that needs more space.
My .02