I had B200's and Hemp Acc. first version FR8's at the same time. To me they're generally close with the B200's being more forward, a bit stronger midbass, and a bit better power handling on ob = ballsier to some degree. The Hemp FR8's seem a bit smoother and more listenable/musical to me = kinder gentler to some degree. I felt they seperated the notes a little better and laid them out easier to digest. I kept the hemps, and they still keep winning over all comers, for me, imo, fwiw... But the B200's are more popular it seems, and I never hated them myself.
Am using hemps now with 15" vintage Philips woofers on ob. Working out better since (today) I messed with the xo. I'm tempted to try the Alpha 15 that seems to be working with all kinds of widerangers via MJK's formula.
I've had the Hemp Acoustics FR8's since they came out, this first version was reportedly a 100% hempcone. The story that has dribbled down is that because of legalities Hemp Acoustics could no longer use 100% hemp cones and so they came up with the Hempmatrix cones. I don't know which is sonically better, but afaik the only 100% hemp cones available are now from A Brown Sun as Hemptone, or Omegas line.
Because mine are supposedly 100% hemp cones as are the Hemptone - and because for some never explained reason (!) the graphs and specs and pictures seem identical (zup!*) I'll make one of those unsupportable statements and say the Hemptones should sound as nice as the ones I'm using (better perhaps?). Were I to buy another pair I'd get those over the unknown Hempmatrix, because I really like the tone of mine.
But YMMV...and all in all I doubt you'd hate any hemp or the B200's. Point being as always it's down to personal tastes, assoc. gear, room, political persuassion, what deal comes along.
Waded a little deeper than expected there...
Don
* I "read in a forum" that the first batch for both companies was the same driver...?