0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 3731 times.
6 out of 10,,,,, just didn't like it all that much myself. It started out slow & loose and it look too long to figure out what the heck was going on. Sure it had it's moments of intense action and the soundtrack was real good but the plot was flimsy. I thought it could have been handled better as was the plot story in 300 (8.5-10). Cheers,Robin
Quote from: satfrat on 8 Mar 2008, 11:38 pm6 out of 10,,,,, just didn't like it all that much myself. It started out slow & loose and it look too long to figure out what the heck was going on. Sure it had it's moments of intense action and the soundtrack was real good but the plot was flimsy. I thought it could have been handled better as was the plot story in 300 (8.5-10). Cheers,RobinRobin, I have to agree that "300" was better than "Beowulf." Ken
Quote from: Bigfish on 9 Mar 2008, 12:02 amQuote from: satfrat on 8 Mar 2008, 11:38 pm6 out of 10,,,,, just didn't like it all that much myself. It started out slow & loose and it look too long to figure out what the heck was going on. Sure it had it's moments of intense action and the soundtrack was real good but the plot was flimsy. I thought it could have been handled better as was the plot story in 300 (8.5-10). Cheers,RobinRobin, I have to agree that "300" was better than "Beowulf." Ken8.5 out of 10 for "300" ?? I was laughing all the movie & because of that I'd give it a solid 3. And you say that it was better than "Beowulf" ? Thanks ,I save my $4 for something else . Regards, L
3/10 lacked interest 300 was a 10/10 sin city8/10
Quote from: mclsound on 9 Mar 2008, 10:55 pm3/10 lacked interest 300 was a 10/10 sin city8/10I saw it in IMAX 3d last year and was stunned by the visuals, but thought the movie pretty much sucked. I'd give it a 4/10.