Okay, we got the Carvers measurements, but...

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Read 2133 times.

Rob Babcock

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 9298
Okay, we got the Carvers measurements, but...
« on: 5 Oct 2003, 11:59 pm »
How's the sound?  They should be pretty well burned in by now.  I'm curious how the measurements correspond to the sound.

Brian Cheney

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2080
    • http://www.vmpsaudio.com
zr1600
« Reply #1 on: 6 Oct 2003, 12:20 am »
It will take about 5 days to do the critical listening, and I may remeasure the amp with the 3 pole filter on the output that Carver is said to recommend.

Of course, no one would listen to the amp with such a filter attached.

Rob Babcock

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 9298
Okay, we got the Carvers measurements, but...
« Reply #2 on: 6 Oct 2003, 12:36 am »
Sounds good.  What speakers will you be using for your listening tests?

Brian Cheney

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2080
    • http://www.vmpsaudio.com
zr1600
« Reply #3 on: 6 Oct 2003, 12:49 am »
Principally the RM 2 and RM 40, since it performed well on the cone dynamic ST/R and 808 at the plant, compared to the Parasound 2200.

B

Rob Babcock

  • Volunteer
  • Posts: 9298
Okay, we got the Carvers measurements, but...
« Reply #4 on: 6 Oct 2003, 12:59 am »
Interesting.  I find that relevant to me, since someday when I buy new speakers, the RM2 is about the price range I'll be shopping in.  I'm also curious to hear what you think of the bass performance as this is an area that people say digital amps excell.