Hello Iron Lion,
Large room-induced peaks, or level set too high, are what cause an otherwise decent subwoofer to "overpower" a room. Using two subwoofers instead of one is likely to improve the low frequency room interaction.
In my opinion two subs placed somewhat asymmetrically is a significant improvement over one sub, and assuming you don't set the levels too high are actually less likely to overpower a room.
You see, each subwoofer location will have a distinct peak-and-dip pattern due to how it interacts with the room (listening position also plays a role, but we'll assume that your listening position doesn't change). By using two subs placed asymmetrically, their peak-and-dip patterns will not overlap and the net result will be smoother bass than you could get from a single (unequalized) sub - and therefore you're less likely to get a room-induced response peak that overpowers the room. And note that equalization only works for one listening area, and can make things worse in another area.
You can read more about the concept of multiple subwoofers here:
http://www.harman.com/wp/pdf/multsubs.pdf Author Todd Welti advocates four symmetrically-positioned subs, offering two suggested placement configurations.
As mentioned my preference is for asymmetrical placement, and here is a brief study that compares asymmetrical placement to one of Welti's symmetrical configurations:
http://www.gedlee.com/downloads/sub%20study%20.pdfI spent several years working on a subwoofer system intended to integrate well with dipole speakers, and the approach that proved by far most successful was a multisub system using four small subs.
If you'd like some specific (but non-critical) suggestions on placement of two subs, let me know the size of your room and which wall your main speakers are along. Also, let me know what approximate frequency the lowpass filter on your sub will be set for, and what the slope of that filter is.
Thanks,
Duke